Bill Overview
Title: PREEMIE Reauthorization Act of 2022
Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2028 research, health care provider education, and other activities focused on preventing and treating preterm birth.
Sponsors: Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Target Audience
Population: People involved with or impacted by preterm births
Estimated Size: 1300000
- The bill focuses on preventing and treating preterm births.
- Preterm birth affects newborns and their families globally.
- The level of healthcare and research support available for preterm births varies significantly by country.
- The initiatives under this bill are likely to influence countries with collaborative healthcare research and policy initiatives with the US.
Reasoning
- The PREEMIE Reauthorization Act of 2022 is targeted towards reducing preterm births and assisting families and healthcare providers who are dealing with them.
- Budget considerations limit the immediate, direct impact to healthcare institutions and families directly dealing with preterm births, however, long-term benefits are expected as research advances.
- It is important to include a range of opinions including from people who may not immediately feel the impact, but could realize benefits indirectly in terms of better healthcare outcomes.
Simulated Interviews
Registered Nurse (California)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the policy is a step in the right direction.
- Increased funding can lead to better neonatal care practices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Medical Researcher (Texas)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's great to see more funding for preterm research.
- This could accelerate some of our ongoing projects and lead to better outcomes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Mother and homemaker (New York)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The additional support can help mothers like me who are struggling with preterm births.
- Access to better information and healthcare is badly needed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 3 |
Pediatrician (Florida)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could provide much-needed resources.
- I hope it helps reduce the stress on families dealing with preterm births.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Policy Analyst (Ohio)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's a necessary investment in public health.
- The U.S. needs more policies like this to support maternal health.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Healthcare Administrator (Illinois)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could improve resource allocation for preterm care.
- Needs stringent monitoring to avoid misuse of funds.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Midwife (Georgia)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm hopeful the policy will increase support for at-risk pregnancies.
- More training for healthcare workers is essential.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 3 |
Retired, former OB-GYN (Massachusetts)
Age: 65 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's a positive move.
- I worry the funds might not be enough to cover all needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Public Health Worker (North Carolina)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is likely to improve public health outcomes.
- I think it will benefit diverse communities across the state.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
University Professor (Pennsylvania)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this legislation strengthens national health priorities.
- Global collaboration could extend its impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $65000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $70000000)
Year 2: $66000000 (Low: $61000000, High: $71000000)
Year 3: $67000000 (Low: $62000000, High: $72000000)
Year 5: $69000000 (Low: $64000000, High: $74000000)
Year 10: $72000000 (Low: $67000000, High: $77000000)
Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $140000000, High: $160000000)
Key Considerations
- The cost estimates depend on the scalability of the research and education initiatives.
- Unforeseen increases in preterm birth rates may impact budgetary assumptions.
- Long-term savings will depend on the effectiveness of prevention programs.