Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5328

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend terminal lakes assistance.

Description: This act extends through October 1, 2025, authority to provide terminal lakes assistance.

Sponsors: Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Target Audience

Population: People relying on or benefiting from terminal lakes.

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Farmer (Rural Nevada)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I depend on Walker Lake for my irrigation needs, and any assistance to keep the lake healthy is beneficial.
  • I'm worried about future droughts, so long-term planning is needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Biologist (Utah)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial as it ensures continued funding, which helps our conservation work.
  • The budget seems limited, but it's a start to address significant ecological challenges.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Retired (Mono Lake, California)

Age: 61 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've watched Mono Lake's water levels fluctuate, and it's alarming.
  • Assistance is necessary to maintain its natural beauty and ecosystems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Tourism Manager (Salt Lake City)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Tourism depends heavily on the lake's health and water levels.
  • Any decline in the lake affects my job, so I’m hopeful this policy brings improvement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

Programmer (Reno, Nevada)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I care about the environment, but this policy doesn’t impact me directly.
  • It’s good if it helps local economies, but my work and life remain the same.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cultural Advisor (Indigenous Community near Pyramid Lake, Nevada)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our cultural heritage and economy need the lake's ecosystem intact.
  • I hope this policy helps tackle ongoing environmental challenges.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 2

Engineer (Las Vegas, Nevada)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see environmental management as crucial, including policies for terminal lakes.
  • However, this doesn’t directly affect my day-to-day work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Fisher (Rural Utah)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fish populations have been dropping due to environmental changes.
  • Policy support is vital for sustaining my livelihood.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Student (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm studying environmental impacts, so it's interesting academically.
  • Doesn't directly change my wellbeing, but informs career perspectives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Government Worker (Sacramento, California)

Age: 64 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support initiatives that preserve natural habitats, reflecting my government background.
  • Although retired, I believe these policies are necessary for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations