Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5304

Bill Overview

Title: POST Act

Description: This bill prohibits the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from closing any USPS facility during the COVID-19 public health emergency period.

Sponsors: Sen. Manchin, Joe, III [D-WV]

Target Audience

Population: People who rely on USPS for mailing and shipping services

Estimated Size: 300000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

USPS Mail Carrier (Bowling Green, KY)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry every day about whether our facility might close.
  • This act would give me some peace of mind, knowing I can continue providing for my family during these times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 3

Small Business Owner (Seattle, WA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My business relies on USPS for timely deliveries, especially now more than ever.
  • Keeping postal services steady means survival for my small business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Retired (Rural Iowa)

Age: 78 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't drive much, so I rely on USPS to deliver my medications safely.
  • Knowing my local post office will stay open reassures me of continued access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Freelance Designer (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • USPS has always been reliable for my materials. Knowing it won’t close during the pandemic is a relief.
  • It's one less thing to worry about when times are already uncertain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

IT Specialist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I rarely use USPS services aside from occasional packages.
  • I don't think the policy will make a significant difference to my life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's nice to know that my local USPS won't be shutting down anytime soon. That means I can get my textbooks without worry.
  • It's one less hassle while I'm focusing on my studies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Retired veteran (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being a vet, my benefits coming through USPS is a huge deal for me.
  • The act ensures that I won't be left hanging during uncertain times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 3

Nurse (Detroit, MI)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Keeping the postal service running means I can focus more on my job and less on erratic mail services.
  • It's crucial in the times we're facing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Warehouse Manager (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Without USPS, our operations would take a hit as alternatives are expensive.
  • I'm glad to hear this act would help keep our essential services intact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

HR Coordinator (Denver, CO)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • In my job, it's crucial that employee documents and materials are mailed timely.
  • Having assurance that USPS will remain open brings some consistency in uncertain times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 2: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 3: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 5: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 10: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 100: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Key Considerations