Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5266

Bill Overview

Title: Investing in Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Act

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2027 activities that support infant and early childhood mental health promotion, intervention, and treatment programs. It also authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services to provide, directly or through grants or contacts with nonprofits, training and technical assistance related to such programs.

Sponsors: Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

Target Audience

Population: Infants and young children up to age five

Estimated Size: 20000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Pediatrician (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy is a crucial step towards early mental health intervention.
  • Improved training will help bridge gaps in our current service offerings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Parent (New York, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is promising, but I worry about accessibility and actual reach.
  • My child could benefit from early mental health programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Mental Health Consultant (Austin, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could redefine early childhood mental health approaches.
  • Funding could help expand resources to more professionals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Preschool Teacher (Columbus, OH)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being on the frontlines, I see how early intervention could help our young ones.
  • I'm hopeful this policy will increase awareness and resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Single Parent (Chicago, IL)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to these resources has been challenging so far.
  • The policy gives me hope for my child's future well-being.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Family Nurse Practitioner (Rural Kansas)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Mental health services are greatly needed here but underfunded.
  • Hopefully, this can enhance our care capabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Child Psychologist (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns with what I've been advocating for in early intervention.
  • Training provisions have long-term benefits for practitioners.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Community Program Director (Miami, FL)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our community consistently needs more support in mental health services.
  • This bill could provide vital lifelines for numerous families.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Advocate (Seattle, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the intent is excellent, execution will be key.
  • Funding determined by geography might leave areas underserved.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Social Worker (Denver, CO)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see the immediate need for early mental health intervention. This could change lives.
  • I hope for comprehensive follow-through on this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $175000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $200000000)

Year 2: $180000000 (Low: $155000000, High: $205000000)

Year 3: $185000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $210000000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations