Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5248

Bill Overview

Title: Mental Health Workforce for Kids Act

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2027 and makes other changes to a demonstration program that supports integrating primary care and behavioral health care in underserved, community-based settings through the provision of training to health care providers. Specific changes include expanding the types of providers who may receive training through the program and incorporating a particular focus on pediatrics.

Sponsors: Sen. Casey, Robert P., Jr. [D-PA]

Target Audience

Population: Children (0-17) worldwide with inadequate access to mental health care

Estimated Size: 74000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner (Urban Texas)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the policy because it will allow providers like me to integrate necessary mental health services into our everyday care routines.
  • The training opportunities will improve my ability to deal with mental health issues, which come up frequently but are hard to address without proper support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Family Medicine Doctor (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training will be a game-changer for our practice.
  • Currently, we're quite overburdened, and this could be an opportunity to offer comprehensive care without sending families far from home.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

School Counselor (Suburban California)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's frustrating to see children slip through the cracks due to inadequate resources.
  • This policy could empower us with better tools and referral options for kids in need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Psychiatrist (Urban New York)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative will likely expand our ability to team with primary care providers for better holistic care.
  • Many youth could benefit from the early intervention this policy might facilitate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Social Worker (Rural Nevada)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe targeted training can help us deliver necessary interventions to kids who might otherwise not receive help.
  • The policy is a much-needed step towards better youth mental health care.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Parent of a child with ADHD (Urban Florida)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An integrated approach could simplify our lives.
  • If primary care could better handle mental health issues, it would save us time and stress in managing appointments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Elementary School Principal (Suburban Ohio)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased training for our community healthcare providers could directly benefit our students.
  • This policy feels like it could bridge gaps we've had in supporting students' mental health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Grandparent raising grandchildren (Urban Illinois)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any policy that could bring more accessible mental health care would be a blessing for us and many others.
  • The stress of managing children's mental health without help has been overwhelming.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Pediatrician (Rural Mississippi)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would expand our capacity to address behavioral issues right in the primary care setting.
  • I think it will enhance services and possibly reduce healthcare costs in the long run.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Hospital Administrator (Urban Washington)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving provider training could amplify our hospital's capacity to serve children in our mental health clinic.
  • I expect increased efficiency and service quality if implemented well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $44000000, High: $66000000)

Year 3: $60000000 (Low: $48000000, High: $72000000)

Year 5: $70000000 (Low: $56000000, High: $84000000)

Year 10: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 100: $200000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $240000000)

Key Considerations