Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5243

Bill Overview

Title: U.S. Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Day Act of 2022

Description: This bill designates March 9 as Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Day. The bill also designates the Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Flag as a symbol of the commitment of the United States to recognizing, and prioritizing the freedom of, citizens and lawful permanent residents held as hostages or wrongfully detained abroad.

Sponsors: Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals who are positively affected by advocacy and awareness for hostages or wrongful detainees abroad

Estimated Size: 50000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

International Relations Specialist (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy might encourage the U.S. government to keep such issues in the public eye, hopefully speeding up resolutions.
  • The hostage and wrongful detainee flag is a powerful symbol that makes a statement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Retired Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy won’t change things directly, but keeping it in the news helps family and friends of detainees.
  • I'm hopeful it brings peace of mind knowing there’s recognition of these issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 5

Oil Engineer (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is more symbolic than practical for someone like me who isn't directly affected.
  • However, it’s reassuring to know there’s a dedicated day and flag.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

NGO Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This day helps elevate the discourse around detainees and hostages; public awareness is critical.
  • I hope it provides more leverage in negotiating releases.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

College Student (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Symbolic days can bring focus to global issues and might influence future policy-making.
  • It’s encouraging, though I doubt it’ll make immediate tangible changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Software Developer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Good symbolism, but for everyday working individuals, this is unlikely to bring any direct change.
  • Governments should naturally be prioritizing hostage releases.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hard to predict the impact, but raising awareness helps us collectively support these families.
  • I hope it inspires legislative action, not just a flag.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Lawyer (Boston, MA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Symbolically strong, this policy could indirectly encourage legislative action.
  • Legal avenues need more than a day or flag.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Journalist (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This highlights an important issue that often gets overlooked until it's on the front page.
  • I can see it influencing coverage decisions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Construction Manager (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill doesn't really affect my life in any noticeable way, unless someone I know is directly involved.
  • The idea is good but it seems like political theater more than real action.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 2: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 3: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 5: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 10: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Year 100: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Key Considerations