Bill Overview
Title: Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Technical Corrections Act
Description: This bill redesignates the Salem Maritime National Historic Site in Salem, MA, as the Salem Maritime National Historical Park. The bill authorizes the Department of the Interior to acquire an interest in the city of Salem for use as a visitor center and curatorial facility (currently, only authorized as a visitor center).
Sponsors: Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]
Target Audience
Population: People affected by the Salem Maritime National Historical Park redesignation
Estimated Size: 80000
- The redesignation of a historic site may enhance its visibility and its ability to attract tourists, thereby potentially benefiting local businesses and individuals working in the tourism sector.
- Residents of Salem may experience changes in community identity and increased civic pride due to the redesignation of a local historic site to a national historical park.
- Visitors to the Salem Maritime site may benefit from improved facilities and services as a result of the redesignation and potential funding increases for infrastructure.
- Local government and municipal resources may be impacted due to changes in tourism traffic and requirements to support more visitors.
- The redesignation is likely to lead to administrative and operational changes requiring coordination among local, state, and national bodies, affecting public sector employees and policies.
Reasoning
- The policy impacts primarily people working in the tourism and local business sectors in Salem as the redesignation and improvement of facilities are likely to attract more visitors.
- Some residents might feel impacted by the change in designation due to perceived changes in community identity or local pride.
- Visitors, especially those interested in history or national parks, might find an improved experience due to better facilities.
- Local government workers and public sector employees in Salem may be involved in administrative changes due to the site's redesignation.
Simulated Interviews
Souvenir shop owner (Salem, MA)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe the redesignation will bring more tourists, which could boost my sales.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Local historian (Salem, MA)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More visibility for our history is always a good thing. I'm excited about better facilities for both locals and tourists.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Frequent visitor to national parks (Boston, MA)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improved facilities would probably enhance my visiting experience. I might consider visiting more often.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
City council member (Salem, MA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This redesignation should help streamline funding processes for our city to maintain the site.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
National Park Service employee (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I anticipate increased work but expect greater resources dedicated to site management.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Tourist (Providence, RI)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A redesignated park might offer better engagement than a regular historic site, enhancing my visits.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Restaurant owner (Salem, MA)
Age: 36 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Hoping that the redesignation attracts more tourists that result in more dining customers.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Local resident (Salem, MA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Redesignation sounds like more tourists and more traffic jams in my area.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Tourism writer (New York, NY)
Age: 47 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A national historical park is more attractive for writing features, increasing my content scope.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
State legislator (Boston, MA)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The redesignation could boost the regional tourism economy, which I support.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 2: $3500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $5000000)
Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $3000000)
Year 5: $1500000 (Low: $750000, High: $2250000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The initial property acquisition and development costs represent the most significant one-time financial outlay.
- Long-term savings potential exists if increased visitation leads to a self-sustaining site, reducing reliance on separate federal funds.
- The potential rise in local tourism will likely affect municipal services and infrastructure, necessitating additional local government coordination.