Bill Overview
Title: Aviation Workforce Development Enhancement Act
Description: This bill expands aviation workforce development programs of the Federal Aviation Administration by providing additional grant funding for aircraft pilot development, the education and recruitment of aviation maintenance technical workers, and the development of the aviation manufacturing workforce.
Sponsors: Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]
Target Audience
Population: People involved in or entering the aviation workforce
Estimated Size: 1000000
- The bill serves to expand workforce development in the aviation sector.
- The implantation of this bill will directly include individuals involved in aviation maintenance, manufacturing, and piloting.
- People entering or currently in education programs related to aviation careers will be directly impacted.
- The bill's efforts are geared towards increasing recruitment which may also affect career transition professionals or those looking to enter the aviation sector from other industries.
- Indirectly, families of individuals working in these sectors will also be impacted due to the potential for increased job opportunities and wages.
Reasoning
- This policy is designed to support individuals directly involved in the aviation industry as well as those aspiring to join it, such as students and career changers.
- Existing professionals, particularly those involved in pilot and technical education, are expected to experience a boost in resources and opportunities.
- Some individuals in the workforce may not experience any direct change but will potentially benefit indirectly from overall industry growth.
- The impact may vary based on geographic proximity to aviation hubs and the presence of educational institutions offering aviation programs.
- Wellbeing impacts are expected to be medium to high for those directly engaged in aviation-related educational programs or seeking career transitions into the industry.
- Individuals indirectly connected through familial ties may experience low to medium impact based on employment stability and opportunities provided by this policy.
Simulated Interviews
Aeronautical Engineering Student (Daytona Beach, FL)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The additional funding could really enhance our training facilities and provide more hands-on learning opportunities.
- Better equipment and better-trained instructors could make a big difference in my readiness for the industry.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Aircraft Maintenance Technician (Seattle, WA)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Access to new training options would keep my skillset up to date, which is crucial in this rapidly advancing industry.
- I see this as a valuable opportunity to secure my job against technological changes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Commercial Pilot (San Antonio, TX)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy might not directly apply to me now, but I see potential industry growth that could enhance job stability and possibly open up more advanced training options.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Aerospace Manufacturing Worker (Wichita, KS)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could be a great opportunity to transition into more skilled roles within the company.
- Training supported by this bill might help me pursue my ambitions without financial burden.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Aviation Instructor (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- With additional grant funding, we can implement advanced simulators and teaching aids, attracting more students to our program.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
High School Student Interested in Aviation (Cleveland, OH)
Age: 19 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The grants could lower the barriers of entry for students like me to enter the aviation field, making aviation education more accessible.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Retired Aviation Engineer (Chicago, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While retired, I might consider re-entering the industry with new initiatives stirring up fresh opportunities, especially in advisory roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Flight Attendant (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although I'm not directly a target for this policy, it could indirectly benefit my career transition ambitions by improving the overall aviation industry's growth and training programs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Aviation Operations Manager (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 36 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If the policy leads to more qualified personnel entering the workforce, it could ease some of the operational challenges we often face, creating a more efficient work environment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Aviation Consultant (Dallas, TX)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A greater talent pool may lead to more innovative solutions and consulting opportunities. Making education more accessible is always a good move for the industry's future.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 2: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 3: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 5: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 10: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 100: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Key Considerations
- Ensuring the effective distribution and utilization of grants is crucial to meet the program's goals.
- Collaboration with educational institutions and industry partners is essential for the success of workforce development initiatives.
- Monitoring and evaluating the outcomes will help in adjusting the programs to ensure maximum impact.
- Potential challenges include aligning educational programs with rapidly advancing aviation technologies.