Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5223

Bill Overview

Title: Housing, Opportunity, Mobility, and Equity Act of 2022

Description: This bill addresses zoning policies, housing affordability, and economic security. Specifically, the bill requires each state or local government that receives a Community Development Block Grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development or a Surface Transportation Block Grant from the Department of Transportation to develop and implement a strategy to support zoning policies or regulatory initiatives that create a more affordable, elastic, and diverse housing supply. Additionally, the bill establishes a tax credit for individuals who spend more than 30% of their adjusted gross income on rent and requires the Department of the Treasury to make advance payments of this credit to eligible taxpayers who elect that option. The bill also requires Treasury to establish a Rainy Day Savings Program to allow an eligible taxpayer to defer 20% of the amount that would otherwise be refunded to the taxpayer. Treasury must invest the deferred amount and later disburse that amount, along with any interest, to the taxpayer.

Sponsors: Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]

Target Audience

Population: People facing housing affordability issues, particularly renters

Estimated Size: 83000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could significantly ease my financial burden with the tax credits. Renting in LA is incredibly expensive, and I often worry about emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 5 4

construction worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about how changes to zoning might affect my home value, but I can see the need for more affordable housing here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

graphic designer (New York City, NY)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Receiving a tax credit for my rent would help immensely. Right now, there's no room for savings or emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 5 3

retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The Rainy Day Savings Program interests me because it could help with my savings. I live on a fixed income now.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 5

mechanic (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the housing improvements in our area could be a good thing, as long as they don't displace people.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

software engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a renter, I'm less affected by this policy, but it's clear some zoning changes might enable better housing options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

artist (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Every bit helps, and if I qualify for rent credits, that's a step up from constant stress about rent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

single parent and customer service representative (Miami, FL)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The savings program could be beneficial. It's hard to save anything extra as a single parent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

tech entrepreneur (Denver, CO)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm more interested in how these changes might open up investment opportunities than the direct benefits of the policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

nurse (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's hard to say how much this will affect me directly, but I support changes that make housing affordable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000000 (Low: $1800000000, High: $2200000000)

Year 2: $2100000000 (Low: $1900000000, High: $2300000000)

Year 3: $2200000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $2400000000)

Year 5: $2500000000 (Low: $2200000000, High: $2700000000)

Year 10: $3000000000 (Low: $2600000000, High: $3200000000)

Year 100: $4500000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $4800000000)

Key Considerations