Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5211

Bill Overview

Title: Interdiction for the Protection of Child Victims of Exploitation and Human Trafficking Act

Description: This bill expands the scope of grants that are awarded through the Department of Justice for specialized human trafficking training and technical assistance for service providers to include Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) programs that build law enforcement capacity to address human trafficking.

Sponsors: Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Target Audience

Population: Children who are victims of exploitation and human trafficking

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 14 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy will mean more children like me don't have to go through what I did.
  • It's good to know police are getting more tools to help us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Social worker (Denver, CO)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial—it will enhance our capacity to provide necessary services to victims.
  • Trafficking cases are complex, and more police training can streamline interventions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 7

Police officer (Rural Alabama)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've heard about trafficking but didn't realize how training could improve the situation.
  • If this policy gets us more training, it could be beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Teacher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad to hear there will be more resources to address trafficking.
  • It's troubling how exploitation can be overlooked; more training should help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Businessman (Houston, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems well-intentioned but I'm not sure about its local impact.
  • Effective use of funds will be crucial for success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

College student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy could really help bring justice for victims.
  • Community policing can be a transformative approach.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While legal support is vital, police training would add another layer of needed intervention.
  • Hope this allocation will result in effective prosecution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Part-time job in a retail store (Las Vegas, NV)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I didn't know much about trafficking, but if it helps keep people safe, it's a good thing.
  • Hopefully, this means better awareness for everyone.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Non-profit director (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More DOJ grants could mean expanded services and outreach.
  • The link with law enforcement is crucial for our work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Public school counselor (Springfield, MO)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Supportive of the policy, it aligns with educational objectives in raising awareness.
  • It's important for the broader safety of our students.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Year 2: $260000000 (Low: $210000000, High: $310000000)

Year 3: $270000000 (Low: $220000000, High: $320000000)

Year 5: $290000000 (Low: $240000000, High: $340000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations