Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5199

Bill Overview

Title: Coral Sustainability Through Innovation Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes the federal agencies on the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force, which includes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to carry out prize competitions that promote coral reef research and conservation. The prize competitions must be designed to help the United States achieve its goal of developing new and effective ways to advance the understanding, monitoring, and sustainability of coral reef ecosystems. Priority is given to establish programs that address communities, environments, or industries that are in distress due to the decline or degradation of coral reef ecosystems.

Sponsors: Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Target Audience

Population: people reliant on coral reef ecosystems for food, coastal protection, and tourism

Estimated Size: 12000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marine Biologist (Miami, Florida)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a great initiative as it can bring more attention and funding to coral research, which is much needed.
  • I hope it leads to innovative methods that can be applied locally to improve our reefs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

Tour operator (Honolulu, Hawaii)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Coral degradation has been bad for business, so I welcome any policy that could reverse this trend.
  • Our livelihood is tied to healthy reefs, so sustainable solutions must be found.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Software Developer (Orlando, Florida)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the coral policy doesn't directly affect my job, it's uplifting to see efforts to preserve natural wonders.
  • Healthy reefs mean better local ecosystems, which benefits us all in the long run.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Fisherman (Key West, Florida)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our catches have decreased because of dying reefs, so any positive change would help.
  • I hope the policy brings quick results.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

Student (Jacksonville, Florida)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy gives students like me hope for job opportunities in coral research.
  • Prize-driven innovation could inspire new career paths.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

Retired (San Diego, California)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm always excited about policies that help preserve underwater life.
  • It might not impact my day-to-day life, but it's vital for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Environmental Lawyer (Miami, Florida)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill is an excellent step towards legally binding conservation efforts.
  • I believe it can lay a groundwork for future policies and stronger protections.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Resort Manager (Galveston, Texas)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having a healthier reef environment could draw more tourists to our resort.
  • I'm optimistic about what the increase in research could mean for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Commercial Diver (Charleston, South Carolina)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our work sometimes involves reef restoration, so more funding could mean more projects.
  • I'm interested to see how prize competitions innovate in this field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 3

Tech Entrepreneur (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could open up collaborative opportunities in tech and marine science.
  • It's great to see innovation prioritized in environmental policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $51000000 (Low: $30700000, High: $71400000)

Year 3: $52020000 (Low: $31314000, High: $72828000)

Year 5: $53120000 (Low: $31812000, High: $74328000)

Year 10: $53700000 (Low: $32220000, High: $75180000)

Year 100: $54000000 (Low: $32400000, High: $75600000)

Key Considerations