Bill Overview
Title: Women's Suffrage National Monument Location Act
Description: This bill authorizes the location of a monument on the National Mall to commemorate the women's suffrage movement and the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.
Sponsors: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
Target Audience
Population: People worldwide with an interest in gender equality and women's rights
Estimated Size: 331000000
- The Women's Suffrage Movement affects individuals globally as it symbolizes the fight for gender equality and women's rights, which continue to be a global concern.
- Women's suffrage is a historical movement that advanced the rights of women, inspiring similar movements worldwide.
- The commemoration of such movements can affect how current and future generations understand gender equality issues.
Reasoning
- The primary impact of a monument such as this is educational and cultural, influencing public awareness and inspiration rather than direct material benefit.
- For those involved in gender equality and women's rights, the monument could offer a symbolic victory and a touchstone for future advocacy efforts.
- The budget constraints dictate the scale of the monument and might limit extensive educational programming.
- People directly participating in movements for gender equality may feel a stronger connection or sense of validation through symbolic recognition.
Simulated Interviews
Museum Curator (New York, NY)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This monument serves as a crucial reminder of the struggles and victories in women's rights.
- It's essential for educating young people and keeping historical achievements alive.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
History Teacher (Dallas, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While I may not visit D.C. often, symbolically it highlights an important part of history.
- It's great material to discuss in the classroom about gender equality.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
College Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 21 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This monument is a celebration of progress and motivates further activism.
- I hope it attracts visitors and inspires them like it inspires me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Retired (Portland, OR)
Age: 67 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- At last, a deserved recognition of our suffrage pioneers.
- I believe it can be a powerful educational tool.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Software Developer (Chicago, IL)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the monument will be a nice addition, though not directly impacting me.
- Hope it sparks more family discussions on important topics.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Community Organizer (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This monument feels like a validation of the work I do in the community.
- I believe it can inspire everyone to take part in civic duties.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Farmer (Montpelier, VT)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The monument is a historical piece more relevant to politicians and academics than to me.
- I understand its importance, but I likely won't visit.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It adds a sense of pride and encouragement to women like me hoping to break glass ceilings.
- I think this celebration strengthens community bonds through shared history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Professor (Boston, MA)
Age: 62 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's heartening to see institutional recognition of women's contributions to democracy.
- It will be an excellent teaching tool for the nation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Electrician (Little Rock, AR)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These political monuments are for the tourists and politicians, probably not for me.
- I appreciate history, but I focus on my daily challenges.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)
Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)
Year 3: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)
Year 5: $35000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $40000000)
Year 10: $40000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $45000000)
Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Key Considerations
- The monument reflects significant historical and cultural values, which are intangible but impactful on societal norms and attitudes.
- Site selection, design, and construction on the National Mall require compliance with federal guidelines, potentially increasing costs.
- Public interest and educational value could justify the expenditure regardless of direct economic returns.