Bill Overview
Title: Advanced Air Mobility Coordination and Leadership Act
Description: This act directs the Department of Transportation to establish an Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) interagency working group to plan and coordinate efforts related to the safety, infrastructure, physical security, cybersecurity, and federal investment necessary to bolster the AAM ecosystem, particularly passenger-carrying aircraft, in the United States. Advanced Air Mobility refers to an air transportation system that moves people and cargo between places using new aircraft designs that are integrated into existing airspace operations as well as operated in local, regional, intraregional, rural, and urban environments. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office must study and report to Congress on the interests, roles, and responsibilities of federal, state, local, and tribal governments affected by AAM aircraft and operations.
Sponsors: Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals who will use or are impacted by Advanced Air Mobility systems
Estimated Size: 5000000
- The bill is focused on establishing a framework for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), which involves new air transportation systems.
- The main target population includes individuals who will use these new forms of transportation, such as commuters, travelers, and residents in areas where AAM systems will be implemented.
- Businesses and industries involved in the development, manufacturing, and operation of AAM vehicles and infrastructure will also be impacted.
- People living or working in regions selected for AAM implementation will experience changes in local transportation, potentially affecting their daily commute and quality of life.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on the Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) system, targeting urban, suburban, and rural areas where new air transit options could improve transport efficiency and connectivity.
- The policy supports both direct users - commuters and travelers - and indirect beneficiaries - those employed within or affected by the AAM industry.
- Varied impacts should be anticipated: from technological and economic benefits for the tech-savvy population to environmental or infrastructural concerns raised by local communities.
- Given the funding constraints, the immediate impact will be limited to pilot programs in select areas, and long-term benefits might be more pronounced as infrastructure and adoption grow.
Simulated Interviews
Finance Professional (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am excited about the possibility of reducing commute times with Advanced Air Mobility (AAM).
- I hope it could decrease traffic congestion in the city.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Software Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think investing in AAM technology is crucial for future mobility.
- It could open up new job opportunities in tech and aviation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Environmental Scientist (Austin, TX)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AAM could be beneficial if it leads to more sustainable city designs.
- There are concerns about noise pollution and wildlife disruption.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Manufacturing Manager (Detroit, MI)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AAM could revitalize the manufacturing sector with new job roles.
- I'm worried about the transition phase affecting current jobs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
University Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 22 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Interested in how AAM can reshape urban environments.
- Concerns about the inclusion of all demographic groups in planning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Farmer (Rural Kansas)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AAM could help improve accessibility to markets and reduce logistics times.
- There are concerns about expenses and technology access.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Public Policy Analyst (Chicago, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AAM represents a significant policy shift for urban mobility.
- There's a need for careful integration into existing transport networks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
Year 20 | 10 | 7 |
Civil Engineer (Boston, MA)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The infrastructure for AAM is an engineering challenge I find exciting.
- Concerns exist about coordination between agencies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
Year 10 | 10 | 7 |
Year 20 | 10 | 7 |
Entrepreneur (Denver, CO)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AAM offers massive opportunities for startups.
- I am hopeful for policies supporting innovation and scaling.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
Year 5 | 10 | 8 |
Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Freelance Writer (Miami, FL)
Age: 46 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm intrigued by how AAM might change urban life and travel.
- There might be challenges related to privacy and cybersecurity.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)
Year 5: $17000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $22000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Investment in AAM is in alignment with broader trends toward innovation in transportation infrastructure, potentially positioning the U.S. as a leader in cutting-edge transit solutions.
- Coordination across multiple agencies and governments could pose logistical challenges.
- Ensuring cybersecurity and physical security of AAM systems is critical to public acceptance and functional safety.