Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5093

Bill Overview

Title: Behavioral Health Network and Directory Improvement Act

Description: This bill increases oversight of health insurance plans' provider directories and revises the network adequacy standards with respect to the accessibility of mental health and substance use disorder providers.

Sponsors: Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]

Target Audience

Population: People with mental health and substance use disorders

Estimated Size: 52300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marketing Specialist (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It can be frustrating when I can’t find an in-network provider that's accepting new patients.
  • Having more options would probably make finding and accessing care much less stressful.
  • If the policy works as intended, it could relieve some of my anxiety about actually getting the care I need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Construction Worker (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Given how hard it is to find help where I live, anything that makes these services more reachable would be a godsend.
  • If specialist providers are added to the network, it might mean I wouldn’t need to travel as far or pay as much out of pocket.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Freelance Graphic Designer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access hasn't been a huge issue for me because teletherapy is an option.
  • However, it would be great for more specialists to be covered under my plan. That would help if I need different kinds of support in the future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

College Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The directories are very misleading sometimes, showing providers that aren’t accepting new patients.
  • With this policy, hopefully I can find someone close by who accepts my insurance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Small Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 53 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Currently, most of my providers aren't covered, which is costly.
  • It's tiring to search for affordable and credible mental health services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

Retired (Tampa, FL)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I usually try to find someone local when I need help, but it's been hard due to lack of options in-network.
  • More therapists and counseling services would be convenient for someone like me, who values face-to-face interactions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Tech Support Manager (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New standards could open doors for seeing more experienced therapists covered by my insurance.
  • It's often the out-of-network costs that prevent me from seeing the right specialists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Teacher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might simplify finding specialists and improve the quality of support available through my current plan.
  • I'm hopeful but I'll need to see those changes actually taking place.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Social Worker (Miami, FL)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • For those who face difficulty in accessing support, this seems like a promising strategy to ease some of those burdens.
  • If implemented well, it can bridge the gap between need and service availability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Student (San Diego, CA)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's really tough not having enough nearby options within my plan, but there's hope that this law helps.
  • The policy might help students like me by providing better coverage locally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $270000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $340000000)

Year 2: $280000000 (Low: $210000000, High: $350000000)

Year 3: $290000000 (Low: $220000000, High: $360000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $230000000, High: $370000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations