Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5068

Bill Overview

Title: Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project Amendments Act of 2022

Description: This bill revises the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project (a water infrastructure project in New Mexico), including by extending through December 31, 2029, the deadline for constructing project facilities and allowing for additional project service areas.

Sponsors: Sen. Lujan, Ben Ray [D-NM]

Target Audience

Population: Residents served by the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project, including the Navajo Nation

Estimated Size: 321000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (Navajo Nation, Arizona)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to clean water has always been a struggle in my community.
  • With this project, I hope we can have better hygiene and less health issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 5

Small Business Owner (Gallup, New Mexico)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hoping this project will reduce water costs and expand my businesses' growth.
  • Currently, water scarcity makes it difficult to maintain stock.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Student (Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe the project will help us understand and implement sustainable water use.
  • Access to regular clean water is crucial for our community's health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Retired (Navajo Nation, Arizona)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Water scarcity impacts our daily life and makes us more reliant on bottled resources.
  • I hope this project makes basics more accessible.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 9 3

Healthcare Worker (Gallup, New Mexico)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The water project will greatly improve public health in our area.
  • Poor water quality leads to numerous health issues that can be prevented.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Community Organizer (Navajo Nation, New Mexico)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our main battle has been the advocacy for better infrastructure.
  • This project provides necessary improvements and helps future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 5

Water Resource Engineer (Albuquerque, New Mexico)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The project signifies a move towards sustainable water management.
  • While I'm not directly affected, I provide support to those who are.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Journalist (Santa Fe, New Mexico)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This project is a significant milestone and should bring notable changes.
  • I hope to report on the success stories arising from this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Policy Analyst (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The extension gives more time to reach areas underserved until now.
  • I aim to help assess the policy's impact on local communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Artisan (Navajo Nation, New Mexico)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Water access is critical for both personal and business needs.
  • I foresee better business prospects with improved water infrastructure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1100000000)

Year 2: $950000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1050000000)

Year 3: $950000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1050000000)

Year 5: $900000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1000000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations