Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5063

Bill Overview

Title: Supporting U.S. Engagement in Expos Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes the Department of State to expend funds for U.S. participation in international fairs and expositions abroad, including for construction and operation of U.S. pavilions or other major exhibits.

Sponsors: Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

Target Audience

Population: People worldwide engaging in or affected by international fairs and expos

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Exhibit Designer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Excited about increased job opportunities in international expositions.
  • Believes the policy can provide exposure to broader markets.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Trade Specialist (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sees potential for more networking and business opportunities overseas.
  • Believes the policy will boost U.S. global trade presence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Cultural Ambassador (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopes for improved funding and support to expand cultural programs.
  • Worries about limited resources reaching small, cultural organizations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Logistics Coordinator (Chicago, IL)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anticipates an increase in workload and job stability.
  • Benefits from potential growth in U.S. exports promoted through expos.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Marketing Executive (Miami, FL)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sees potential for expanded markets and partnerships.
  • Wonders how much benefit will reach smaller companies versus larger corporations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Startup Founder (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Eager to leverage international expos for networking and growth.
  • Concerned about startup visibility and whether the policy will reach smaller entities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Export Manager (Houston, TX)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Looks forward to increased export opportunities.
  • Wonders if the investment will translate to significant new business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Graphic Designer (Portland, OR)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopeful for increased creative projects from enhanced U.S. expo presence.
  • Aware growth may mostly benefit larger agencies and firms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Cultural Program Director (Seattle, WA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Positive about cultural exchange growth opportunities.
  • Cautiously optimistic about long-term cultural impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

University Professor (Boston, MA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Believes fostering cultural understanding is imperative.
  • Thinks that while academic benefits are indirect, they are significant.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 5: $26000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $31000000)

Year 10: $27000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $32000000)

Year 100: $28000000 (Low: $23000000, High: $33000000)

Key Considerations