Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5053

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to provide for the meaningful participation of Taiwan in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

Description: This bill authorizes the Department of State, in coordination with the Department of Commerce, to initiate a U.S. plan to secure Taiwan's meaningful participation in the International Civil Aviation Organization.

Sponsors: Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: global airline passengers

Estimated Size: 99000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

International Business Consultant (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe increasing Taiwan's participation in global aviation matters is crucial for safety and efficiency.
  • This might help in securing better flight routes, reducing delays which directly affects my work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Airline Pilot (New York, NY)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhancements in international aviation cooperation are always welcome.
  • Better safety standards and coordination can significantly improve my job experience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 7

Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems like a smart move in terms of geopolitical relations and commercial aviation progress.
  • As someone studying this field, I see the potential long-term benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure how much this policy affects my personal life, but anything that assures safer flights is good.
  • Direct impacts seem limited for a regular traveler like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Tech Industry Executive (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could improve business travel experiences and operational efficiencies.
  • Connectivity and on-time performance are crucial for staying competitive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 7

Aerospace Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any policy that strengthens global aviation cooperation and safety standards is beneficial.
  • This could lead to innovative opportunities and research advancements in my field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Travel Blogger (Miami, FL)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Easier travel routes and improved timing would provide better content and experiences for my followers.
  • I think the policy could streamline travel logistics into Asia.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 7

Software Developer (Boston, MA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I don't travel much, I understand that this kind of coordination is critical for tech progress and efficiency.
  • Direct impact on my life seems minimal.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 6

Airline Customer Service Manager (Houston, TX)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that might ease operational challenges and improve customer experience is welcome.
  • I hope it can reduce the stress of delays and enhance coordination.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Undergraduate Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could make my travel to Taiwan more convenient and safe, but it's more of a side benefit than a major concern for me personally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 2: $78000000 (Low: $52000000, High: $104000000)

Year 3: $80000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $110000000)

Year 5: $85000000 (Low: $58000000, High: $120000000)

Year 10: $95000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $145000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations