Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5051

Bill Overview

Title: Foster Youth and Driving Act

Description: This bill expands state foster care and adoption assistance programs to provide driving preparation assistance to foster youth and related training for foster parents. The bill further directs assistance to states and tribal organizations for age-appropriate foster youth to, among other things, obtain automobile insurance, complete driver's education, obtain a driver's license, and purchase a vehicle.

Sponsors: Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: Foster youth impacted by driving preparation assistance

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

high school student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm excited about this policy because driving is a key skill I need for college and work.
  • Without this support, it would be hard to afford driving lessons and insurance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

part-time worker (Dallas, TX)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for me as it's tough to get around without a license.
  • Having a car would mean I could accept jobs further away and increase my earnings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

foster parent (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program is a relief; I was concerned about how to support my teen’s driving education.
  • The training for parents is a great addition.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

social worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy will benefit many of the teens I work with.
  • It offers a structured path to a skill that's often assumed but not accessible to many foster youth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

retired (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any assistance is welcome; rural areas desperately need support for transportation-related costs.
  • I worry whether this will reach our part of the country effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

college student (New York, NY)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having support to get a driving license would make life easier and cheaper for me.
  • I'm scared I'll have to depend on friends for rides indefinitely.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

high school student (Miami, FL)

Age: 16 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Finally, an opportunity to learn a skill that can help me break the cycle of moving.
  • I hope I get chosen to receive the benefits of this program soon.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

middle school student (Denver, CO)

Age: 14 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing this program will be available when I'm older makes me feel more secure.
  • It's good to know that foster families also get support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

teacher (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy complements what I teach by offering tangible support.
  • However, I worry about the adequacy of funds given the large number of foster youth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

program manager (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although I'm no longer directly impacted, seeing such support makes me hopeful for future generations.
  • This could break barriers for current foster teens.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $480000000 (Low: $380000000, High: $580000000)

Year 3: $460000000 (Low: $360000000, High: $560000000)

Year 5: $420000000 (Low: $320000000, High: $520000000)

Year 10: $380000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $460000000)

Year 100: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Key Considerations