Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/5

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure appropriate supervision requirements for outpatient physical therapy and outpatient occupational therapy.

Description: This bill prohibits the supervision requirements for physical therapy assistants and occupational therapy assistants for covered outpatient services under Medicare from being different from supervision requirements under state law.

Sponsors: Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE]

Target Audience

Population: People enrolled in Medicare who receive outpatient physical or occupational therapy

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired Teacher (Florida)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy simplifies my therapy process. It's quite a hassle dealing with differing rules.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Engineer (California)

Age: 72 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect this policy might let my therapists work more effectively, which is crucial for my recovery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Retired Nurse (New York)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully, it means less red tape and more focus on therapy outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Farmer (Texas)

Age: 80 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It might improve therapy delivery, making it less bureaucratic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired musician (Illinois)

Age: 74 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill should streamline my care, hopefully improving recovery time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired librarian (Ohio)

Age: 69 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully, the policy eases my treatment flexibility, which can be a barrier now.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Manager (Georgia)

Age: 77 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Aligning supervision requirements may simplify my ongoing treatment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Housewife (Virginia)

Age: 82 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any policy that reduces complications for my care is appreciated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Retired Scientist (Massachusetts)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect more consistent care and less hassle if state laws guide supervision.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Bookkeeper (Michigan)

Age: 66 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Alignment with state laws should streamline services, which is always welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Key Considerations