Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4996

Bill Overview

Title: Syria Detainee and Displaced Persons Act

Description: This bill addresses detainees in Syria affiliated with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), including by requiring an interagency strategy regarding such detainees.

Sponsors: Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: Detainees and displaced persons in Syria affiliated with ISIS

Estimated Size: 2

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Foreign Policy Analyst (Washington D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy is necessary to deal with the ongoing challenges posed by ISIS detainees.
  • It could strengthen U.S. ties with allies in the region working on this issue.
  • There are risks of not addressing these foreign detainees, as they might radicalize more individuals if not contained properly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Journalist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy appears to be a positive step towards a more humane and strategic approach to a complicated issue.
  • I'm concerned about the conditions in detention camps and hope this policy addresses human rights adequately.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Graduate Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I see this as a step towards solving a complex issue, I wonder about its effectiveness given the limited budget.
  • I hope more resources are allocated towards addressing the root causes of extremism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Military Officer (New York, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It is crucial to address the detainee situation; we've seen the consequences of neglect in the rise of ISIS.
  • Ensuring these individuals are handled correctly could prevent future threats to U.S. security.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

College Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think this policy affects me directly, but it's interesting as a case study for international law and relations.
  • We need to balance national security with humanitarian efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Social Worker (Kansas City, MO)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive if this policy ensures humane treatment and fair repatriation processes for detainees.
  • It's vital to recognize and address potential psychological impacts on these individuals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy brings more stability to regions affected by ISIS, potentially opening up new markets for business.
  • Stability leads to improved prospects for everyone, including migrants from conflict zones.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Oil Industry Executive (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From an economic perspective, I'm keen on any policy that can stabilize the region, indirectly supporting energy markets.
  • This policy, although small in budget, could be a step toward reducing conflict-driven market volatility.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Tech Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy seems peripheral to my life, but it demonstrates U.S.' engagement with global human rights issues.
  • I support more comprehensive strategies for conflict zones, even if the impact is hard to measure immediately.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Actor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy aligns with my advocacy for refugee rights, as it relates to detainee human rights.
  • I am concerned about the real impact, given limited budgetary allocations for such a broad issue.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $105000000 (Low: $84000000, High: $126000000)

Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $88000000, High: $132000000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations