Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4972

Bill Overview

Title: PROCURE Act

Description: This bill establishes a Critical Munitions Acquisition Fund to finance the acquisition or ensure the availability of certain munitions during the war in Ukraine and future conflicts. The fund may accept contributions from foreign entities, foreign governments, or international organizations. The authority for the fund expires at the end of 2024.

Sponsors: Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: People involved in production, distribution, and utilization of munitions

Estimated Size: 3000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Defense Analyst (Arlington, VA)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this policy as essential for ensuring our military readiness.
  • Foreign contributions to this fund are a strategic benefit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Military Personnel (Colorado Springs, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I feel more secure knowing there are plans for ensuring munitions availability.
  • I am slightly concerned about relying on foreign funds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Defense Industry Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy secures my job and the local economy is reliant on defense contracts.
  • The stability offered by foreign contributions is a necessary aspect.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Policy Advisor (Portsmouth, NH)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a strategic standpoint, this is a smart move to ensure munitions are available during conflicts.
  • However, reliance on foreign contributions raises sovereignty issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Enlisted Soldier (Fort Hood, TX)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing that there is reliable funding for munitions makes my job easier and safer.
  • Any policy that focuses on readiness is good in my book.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired Navy Officer (San Diego, CA)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This seems like a necessary policy given global tensions.
  • I do worry about relying on uncertain international funding streams.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Defense Supply Chain Manager (Rock Island, IL)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The assurance that munitions will be plentiful simplifies my planning responsibilities.
  • I think it's a forward-thinking approach despite political complexities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 3

Professor of International Policy (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 56 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a logical step to sustain military operations.
  • I remain skeptical about handling foreign contributions and their influence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Research Scientist (Santa Clara, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Steady funding for munitions indirectly supports my research as well.
  • It's important to see international collaboration in defense efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Munitions Production Supervisor (Anniston, AL)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Ensuring munitions demand helps secure my job and local employment.
  • This might affect productivity timelines positively with stable funding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $2000000000)

Year 2: $1500000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $2000000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations