Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4958

Bill Overview

Title: Keeping Our Commitment to Ending Veteran Homelessness Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2024 the Supportive Services for Veterans Families program (which provides financial assistance for supportive services for very low-income veteran families in permanent housing or transitioning from homelessness) and the program that provides additional and comprehensive services for homeless veterans at certain locations.

Sponsors: Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Target Audience

Population: Very low-income and homeless veterans

Estimated Size: 1200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Unemployed, former construction worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program can finally help me get a stable roof over my head. Hope it cuts the waiting time.
  • Being able to move into permanent housing would help me focus on finding work again.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 6 4

Part-time retail associate (Houston, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could be a safety net for us, finally some relief from constant fear of eviction.
  • I hope the funds are enough to reach families like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired (New York, NY)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might not impact me much directly as I'm already housed, but it’s good to know younger veterans are getting help.
  • There should be more focus on preventing homelessness in the first place.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Freelance IT consultant (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully, this can give me the nudge to stabilize housing and focus on upskilling for steady work.
  • It feels like a chance to get back on my feet.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 5 4

Prison officer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think this will change my situation, but it’s crucial others get help.
  • It’ll reduce the number of veterans I see struggling on the streets.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 6 5

Mechanic (Denver, CO)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I could use support to ease my rent burdens, it’s too tight to manage at my age.
  • This policy might bridge my needs until I can fully retire.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Bartender (Miami, FL)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 2

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This can make a huge difference, housing brings stability and sanity.
  • I hope they consider extending more support specifically for women veterans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 2
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Volunteer coordinator at veteran charity (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a positive move for the community and aligns with our advocacy work.
  • The impact is small scale relative to the need, but definitely a step in the right direction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Part-time school aide (Portland, OR)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this policy can ease rent or provide better housing options, it's indispensable for families like mine.
  • Skeptical about execution and reach, but hopeful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Self-employed, gig economy (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could stabilize my life and allow me to focus on getting steady work again.
  • Will see if it really reaches those in the greatest need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 2
Year 5 7 2
Year 10 6 2
Year 20 5 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $400000000 (Low: $380000000, High: $450000000)

Year 2: $410000000 (Low: $390000000, High: $460000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations