Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4933

Bill Overview

Title: Puyallup Tribe of Indians Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2022

Description: This bill takes approximately 17.264 acres of specified lands in Pierce County, Washington, into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation. Lands taken into trust shall be part of the tribe's reservation.

Sponsors: Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]

Target Audience

Population: Members of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians

Estimated Size: 5996

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Cultural Resource Manager (Pierce County, Washington)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Taking more land into trust means that our cultural resources are better protected and managed by us.
  • I believe this will have a positive long-term impact on our tribe's wellbeing and cultural heritage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 4

Student (Puyallup, Washington)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not directly impacted by the land trust change, but I think it's good for the tribe and community.
  • Land transfers can bring about new opportunities for everyone in the area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Small Business Owner (Tacoma, Washington)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think this affects me directly, but changes in land management might alter business opportunities.
  • I'm supportive of the tribe having more control over their land.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Tribal Member and Environmental Activist (Pierce County, Washington)

Age: 45 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a critical step in reclaiming and managing our rightful lands.
  • The environmental preservation aspects are particularly important for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 10 6
Year 10 10 5
Year 20 10 4

Teacher (Fife, Washington)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhancing our land through trust helps improve our educational resources for children.
  • The move offers long-term educational and cultural benefits for tribal members.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Retired Policymaker (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think any progress in supporting indigenous sovereignty is positive.
  • This act might help set a precedent for other similar actions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 6

Community Health Worker (Puyallup Reservation, Washington)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative may help improve access to adequate health facilities on our land.
  • Land developments could indirectly support community health initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Real Estate Developer (Tacoma, Washington)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important to respect tribal sovereignty and see how potential zoning changes might benefit the economy.
  • We need to ensure that development respects cultural sites and natural resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Local Government Official (Bonney Lake, Washington)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This change will require coordination between local governments and the tribe to ensure smooth transitions.
  • Cross-jurisdictional collaboration could set examples for future projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Artist (Pierce County, Washington)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy emphasizes tribal sovereignty which can offer more artistic opportunities to express cultural heritage.
  • This can lead to new artistic ventures and collaborations with tribal members.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 2: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 3: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 5: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Key Considerations