Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4918

Bill Overview

Title: Increasing Prescription Drug Competition Act

Description: This bill provides that certifications in generic drug applications of certain patents involved in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs have no effect upon the drug's approval. (The Food and Drug Administration sometimes requires a REMS program for certain drugs with safety risks, which may include restrictions on a drug's distribution through elements to ensure safe use (ETASU), such as special requirements for pharmacies that dispense the drug.) Specifically, certifications in generic drug applications with respect to patents that involve an ETASU for REMS requirements have no effect on the effective date of the drug's approval, notwithstanding any other provisions that allow for a stay of approval pending litigation outcomes (i.e., 30-month stay). The bill also specifies that in a civil action alleging patent infringement with respect to REMS requirements, the sponsor of the approved brand-name drug may only seek damages from (rather than an injunction against) the generic drug applicant.

Sponsors: Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: People dependent on prescription drugs globally

Estimated Size: 220000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

retired (Florida)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I really hope this policy makes my medications more affordable.
  • With my fixed income, I sometimes have to choose between buying medicine or other necessities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 5

pharmacist (New York)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased generic availability is helpful, but adjusting to new regulations can be a hassle.
  • In the long term, it can drive business by reducing costs for consumers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

healthcare advocate (California)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is overdue. Lowering drug costs can save lives especially in underserved areas.
  • We need immediate and tangible results for those who are most vulnerable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

software engineer (Texas)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Prescription costs are high. I'm excited to see if generics will make a difference.
  • I'm skeptical if the policy will roll out soon enough to affect the drugs I need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

hospital administrator (Michigan)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Lower drug costs could significantly reduce hospital expenses.
  • I expect the transition may initially increase workload to navigate changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

retired (Ohio)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Medicines are already affordable for me through the VA.
  • I hope this helps others who aren't as lucky with their benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

freelance writer (Washington)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Generic options could make my antidepressants affordable.
  • Currently, paying out-of-pocket is a huge burden.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

primary care physician (Illinois)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More generics could improve my patients' adherence to treatment plans.
  • Changes in REMS will need careful consideration to maintain safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

small business owner (Oregon)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support policies that help reduce healthcare costs.
  • Generics are an essential part of affordable health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

graduate student (Massachusetts)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a student, every dollar counts. Generic medicines could really help.
  • I worry about long-term effects if REMS adjustments are not effective.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Year 5: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Year 10: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Year 100: $25000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $40000000)

Key Considerations