Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4860

Bill Overview

Title: Malheur Community Empowerment for the Owyhee Act

Description: This bill addresses various public land concerns in Malheur County in Oregon, including grazing. The bill also designates wilderness areas and conveys land to the Burns Paiute Tribe in Oregon.

Sponsors: Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]

Target Audience

Population: Residents and stakeholders of Malheur County, Oregon

Estimated Size: 14000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Rancher (Malheur County, Oregon)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might reduce the available grazing lands, making it harder for us to sustain our cattle numbers.
  • The transfer of lands may affect grazing rights in current use but could be manageable if grazing alternatives are identified.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 4 5
Year 10 4 5
Year 20 3 4

Conservation Biologist (Malheur County, Oregon)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The wilderness designation is a positive step for preserving the natural environment.
  • Protecting these lands aligns with long-term ecological goals, though some pushback from local ranchers is expected.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Tribal Member and Cultural Educator (Burns, Oregon)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The land conveyance is crucial for us; it will help preserve and educate others about our cultural heritage.
  • This policy will help strengthen our community's foundation for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 5

Legislative Advocate (Portland, Oregon)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy represents a successful instance of indigenous advocacy paying off.
  • The land reallocation aspect of the bill aligns with the broader objective of returning lands to rightful tribal ownership.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Forestry Worker (Malheur County, Oregon)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having seen land management practices evolve, this policy seems controversial but necessary for future generations.
  • With changes to forest management, access for hunting and recreation won't be entirely lost but may be restricted.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 5 6

Environmental Consultant (Salem, Oregon)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The preservation of wilderness areas has been a key lookout for local ecosystems.
  • The bill may pose challenges to land use for traditional economic purposes but strengthens ecological balance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Outdoor Recreation Business Owner (Boise, Idaho)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The wilderness designation may limit some recreational activities like off-roading, affecting parts of our business.
  • However, opportunities will arise through eco-tourism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Teacher (Malheur County, Oregon)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The bill supports educational opportunities about the importance of wilderness and land stewardship.
  • Could leverage these changes to teach about responsible resource management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

College Student (Ontario, Oregon)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a testament to prioritizing environmental and indigenous cultural considerations.
  • A great case study for balancing economic activities and ecological preservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Park Ranger (Bend, Oregon)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Preserving these lands through policy is vital to ensuring their continued survival for future generations.
  • Local communities may initially resist, but long-term ecological benefits are undeniable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 3: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 5: $13000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $17000000)

Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 100: $3000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $4000000)

Key Considerations