Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4844

Bill Overview

Title: National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2022

Description: This bill sets out a pilot program to support state agencies, state boards of nursing, nursing schools, or other eligible entities with establishing or expanding state-based nursing workforce centers that carry out research, planning, and programs to address nursing shortages, nursing education, and other matters affecting the nursing workforce. The bill also expands the authority of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to establish health workforce research centers and specifically requires that HRSA establish a center focused on nursing.

Sponsors: Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

Target Audience

Population: Nurses and nursing students worldwide

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Registered Nurse (New York City, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy will actually lead to solutions for our staffing problems.
  • More research and support are definitely needed for nursing education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Nursing School Educator (Cleveland, OH)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The funding for nursing workforce centers is quite crucial for educational development.
  • I believe this will help attract more students into nursing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Nursing Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm really worried about finding a good job when I graduate, so hopefully this helps.
  • Support for nursing students can make a big difference.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Health Policy Analyst (Miami, FL)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could be pivotal in addressing systemic staffing issues.
  • It's an interesting move, but the budget constraints might limit its effectiveness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Small Clinic Administrator (Rural Kansas)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We've been facing nurse shortages for years, this policy gives me hope.
  • I'd like to see more direct help for rural healthcare facilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Nurse Practitioner (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Investing in the nursing workforce is a win for public health.
  • I am optimistic about new training programs but worried about their implementation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Nursing Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More support for our education and jobs is badly needed.
  • It could open up more opportunities for me when I graduate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired Nurse (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything to help improve the nursing landscape is crucial.
  • I'm glad to see focus on long-term workforce solutions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Hospital Administrator (Portland, OR)

Age: 57 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We constantly struggle with staffing, so this policy could help.
  • It's vital to align these plans with on-ground realities of hospital operations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Registered Nurse (Denver, CO)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about burnout, any help to get more nurses would be a relief.
  • The policy promises support in expanding our workforce and that's badly needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $6000000 (Low: $4800000, High: $7200000)

Year 3: $7000000 (Low: $5600000, High: $8400000)

Year 5: $8500000 (Low: $6800000, High: $10200000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations