Bill Overview
Title: DISCLOSE Act of 2022
Description: 2022 This bill addresses campaign finance, including by expanding the prohibition on campaign spending by foreign nationals, requiring additional disclosures of campaign expenditures, and requiring additional disclosures regarding certain political advertisements. Specifically, the bill expands existing foreign money prohibitions to include disbursements for paid web-based or digital communications and federal judicial nomination communications. It also prohibits foreign nationals from contributing to campaigns related to ballot initiatives and referenda. The Government Accountability Office must, for each four-year election cycle, study and report on the incidence of illicit foreign money in federal elections. Next, the bill makes it unlawful to establish or use a corporation, company, or other entity with the intent to conceal an election contribution or donation by a foreign national. A violator is subject to criminal penalties—a fine, a prison term of up to five years, or both. Covered organizations (e.g., corporations, labor organizations, and political organizations) must, within 24 hours, file reports with the Federal Election Commission to disclose campaign expenditures of more than $10,000 during an election cycle. The bill also requires organizations to provide additional disclosures regarding political advertisements, including the donors who contributed the most money to that organization in the last year.
Sponsors: Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]
Target Audience
Population: People influenced by or participating in democratic elections worldwide
Estimated Size: 258000000
- The bill targets campaign finance, focusing on transparency and preventing foreign influence in US elections. This directly affects voters in the United States, as it aims to ensure fair elections without foreign interference.
- All voters in the United States will potentially be affected because their electoral processes might become more transparent and less influenced by undisclosed money and foreign entities.
- Foreign nationals are directly mentioned as being impacted since the bill expands prohibitions on their involvement in various campaign-related activities.
- Political organizations, corporations, and other covered entities will need to comply with new reporting requirements, impacting how they operate financially and report donations and expenditures.
Reasoning
- The DISCLOSE Act is related to campaign finance reform, which primarily impacts political organizations, corporations, and voters. These entities make up diverse groups in the U.S. population.
- Most voters may see some indirect benefits in terms of election integrity, but specific impacts will vary significantly.
- Organizations involved in political funding must comply with new regulations, making their experiences more directly impacted by the policy.
- The budget constraints mean not all aspects of the policy can be thoroughly implemented immediately. Thus, tangible benefits or changes in wellbeing for most everyday citizens may not be highly visible, particularly in the early years.
Simulated Interviews
small business owner (California)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The increased transparency is good, but the paperwork could be a hassle for small business owners who make political contributions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
corporate executive (Texas)
Age: 56 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The corporation will need to adapt, but transparency could level the playing field in political contributions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
Year 3 | 6 | 7 |
Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
political activist (New York)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a step in the right direction for ensuring fair elections and reducing dark money influence.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
retired teacher (Florida)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope this will finally bring some honesty to elections. I've become cynical over the years.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
unemployed (Washington)
Age: 24 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Glad to see new laws but skeptical of enforcement. Will they actually work?
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
Year 2 | 4 | 4 |
Year 3 | 4 | 4 |
Year 5 | 4 | 4 |
Year 10 | 4 | 4 |
Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
factory worker (Ohio)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Not sure how this impacts me directly. I just want honest elections.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
lawyer (Illinois)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More legal work for ensuring compliance, but transparency is necessary.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
journalist (New Mexico)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Transparency will help my job and the public stay informed.
- Challenges in getting real-time and reliable data may arise, but overall a positive development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
political consultant (New York)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Campaign strategy will need adjustments, imposing new costs and challenges.
- The act could level the field but will initially bring complexity.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
retired (Arizona)
Age: 72 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I want my grandchildren to have fair elections.
- Any policy ensuring transparency is good for democracy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)
Year 2: $50000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $75000000)
Year 3: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $50000000)
Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $35000000)
Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $25000000)
Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $15000000)
Key Considerations
- Implementation costs are primarily driven by increased workload on the FEC and GAO for compliance monitoring and reporting.
- The transparency aims of the bill do not directly lead to financial savings but intend to enhance accountability in campaign financing.
- Long-term benefits may include a more robust democratic process but are challenging to monetize.