Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4784

Bill Overview

Title: Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument Access Act

Description: This bill modifies the boundaries of the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine. The boundaries of the monument shall be the boundaries depicted on the map titled Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument Proposed Boundary Revision and dated July 2022. The Department of the Interior may acquire, by purchase from a willing seller, donation, or exchange (1) land and interests in land within the boundary of the monument, and (2) land and interests in land for access into the monument from roads and communities adjacent to or in the vicinity of the monument. Nothing in this bill authorizes the use of eminent domain to acquire land or an interest in land. Any land added to the monument shall be managed to preserve existing hunting, fishing, and snowmobile uses. The bill allows for the gathering by hand of fiddlehead ferns in the monument for personal use and consumption by the general public.

Sponsors: Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals connected to the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine

Estimated Size: 1300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

small business owner (lodging) (Millinocket, Maine)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy is generally a good idea as it should increase the number of tourists. More visitors could mean more business for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

retired (Patten, Maine)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As long as I can keep hunting and fishing as I've always done, I'm okay with it. I just hope it doesn't bring too many crowds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

environmental activist (Portland, Maine)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of expanding protections but concerned about how this impacts natural habitats. It's a balance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

landowner (Bangor, Maine)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I would consider selling if the price is right, but I'm worried about losing control over my property.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

snowmobile tour guide (Shirley Mills, Maine)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I rely on the trails staying open for business. It's good to know we can continue as usual.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

tourist (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm excited about the expanded boundaries. It could offer new trails and experiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

fiddlehead fern forager (Houlton, Maine)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad we can still gather fiddlehead ferns. It's a tradition and part of our lifestyle.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

state government employee (Augusta, Maine)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any change needs careful management, and I'm hopeful this policy won't strain our resources too much.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

student (Dover-Foxcroft, Maine)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm interested in how these changes might become case studies for conservation courses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

community leader (Caribou, Maine)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My priority is ensuring the voices of our community are heard in these changes. The policy seems quite balanced.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 2: $4000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $4000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $6000000)

Year 5: $3000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $5000000)

Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $4000000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $3000000)

Key Considerations