Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4779

Bill Overview

Title: ISS Extension Act of 2022

Description: This bill extends U.S. support and use of the International Space Station through FY2030.

Sponsors: Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: People involved with or benefiting from the International Space Station

Estimated Size: 30000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

NASA Engineer (Houston, Texas)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The ISS Extension Act is crucial for the continuity of our projects and international partnerships.
  • This extension allows us to plan long-term research on ISS-related initiatives, improving outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Space Technology Entrepreneur (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The continuation of the ISS is pivotal for our company, allowing us to innovate further.
  • It provides a stable platform for testing our technologies, which is invaluable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 8 2

Space-related Policy Researcher (New York City, New York)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act will bolster my research and provides a rich case study for international collaboration.
  • It secures a framework for sustained international relations and cooperation in space.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Space Tourism Agency Owner (Orlando, Florida)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Extending ISS support enriches our space tourism offerings and enhances public interest.
  • This is good for business and for inspiring future generations of space enthusiasts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

University Professor (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The ISS Extension Act is a teaching tool and influences educational content significantly.
  • Our students gain from research opportunities linked with the ISS.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 7 3

Retired Observatory Operator (Rural Montana)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's great for space exploration but less relevant in my daily life post-retirement.
  • Seeing continued support for space exploration is comforting but doesn't impact me directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Graduate Student in Astrophysics (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The ISS Extension Act ensures continuity and critical data for my research.
  • It’s foundational for the next phases of my academic and professional careers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

Retired Engineer (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad to see sustained support for the ISS but feel leftovers are indirect to my current life.
  • It validates the work we did during my career, to know it continues to matter.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 3

Public School STEM Teacher (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The ISS Extension Act helps integrate cutting-edge content into my lessons.
  • Students are inspired by real-world applications of science from the ISS.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 7 3

Biotech Researcher (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The continuation of ISS means our research on microgravity will not face disruptions.
  • It's vital for discoveries that impact health and biotechnology sectors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Year 2: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Year 3: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Year 5: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Year 10: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Year 100: $3500000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $4000000000)

Key Considerations