Bill Overview
Title: Acting on the Annual Duplication Report Act of 2022
Description: This bill requires various activities to implement recommendations identified in a report issued by the Government Accountability Office for reducing fragmentation, overlap, and duplication in federal programs. It specifically addresses recommendations concerning (1) the regulation of radioactive materials and disposal of low-level radioactive waste, and (2) coordination of federal efforts to reduce the risks of chronic health conditions through diet.
Sponsors: Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals impacted by federal program efficiency and health policies
Estimated Size: 150000000
- The bill involves reducing fragmentation, overlap, and duplication in federal programs.
- Part of the bill focuses on the regulation of radioactive materials and disposal of low-level radioactive waste, which impacts populations near disposal sites and industries handling radioactive materials globally.
- The bill also seeks to improve efforts to reduce chronic health conditions through diet, affecting populations at risk of these conditions globally, as well as public health and nutrition sectors.
Reasoning
- The policy aims to reduce program inefficiency, potentially leading to cost savings and improved service delivery.
- Regulation of radioactive materials will specifically impact those living in or working near disposal sites, emphasizing safety improvements.
- Efforts to improve diet-related health outcomes can broadly impact the American population, as chronic health conditions are prevalent among millions of Americans.
- The $200 million budget for the first year might limit the depth of initial impact, but strategic implementation could set a foundation for change.
- Long-term budget allocations bolster the potential for sustained improvements in public health and environmental safety.
Simulated Interviews
Environmental Scientist (Nevada, USA)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am hopeful this policy will finally streamline regulations and enhance safety practices.
- Reducing duplication in program efforts could help focus resources on real risks and concerns.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Factory Worker (Texas, USA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm interested to see how this will change safety regulations at work.
- I hope it doesn't just mean more paperwork.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Nutritionist (California, USA)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Addressing chronic health via diet is crucial.
- Policy alignments might bolster ongoing public health initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Public Health Official (New York, USA)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Efficiency is always welcome, especially with health policy impacts.
- Streamlining resources could potentially influence many ongoing projects positively.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Health Insurance Agent (Ohio, USA)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- There is a clear need for holistic approaches in managing chronic health concerns.
- This policy might help consolidate resources, making access clearer and more effective.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Local Government Official (Kentucky, USA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Regulating radioactive materials better is vital for community safety.
- We need assurances that such policies effectively protect our communities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Industry Regulatory Manager (Georgia, USA)
Age: 46 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More regulation often translates to higher operational costs.
- It is challenging to balance safety and economic feasibility in these shifts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Community Health Coordinator (Utah, USA)
Age: 48 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policies that focus on efficiency and diet improvement are steps in the right direction.
- This could greatly aid in the prevention of chronic diseases through better-focused programs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Graduate Student (Arizona, USA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Aligning health policies to improve system utilization is promising.
- Legislative efforts setting precedence in health improvement piques my interest as a future policymaker.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Retired Engineer (Illinois, USA)
Age: 72 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's about time the government streamlined radioactive waste regulations.
- There should be a clearer roadmap to effective policy implementation affecting daily lives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)
Year 2: $180000000 (Low: $140000000, High: $220000000)
Year 3: $160000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $190000000)
Year 5: $130000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $160000000)
Year 10: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)
Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Key Considerations
- Coordination across multiple federal agencies can be challenging and delay implementation.
- Realizing full efficiency benefits may take several years, impacting estimated timelines.
- Potential public opposition from communities near radioactive waste disposal sites may cause delays and increase costs.