Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4718

Bill Overview

Title: Australia-United States Submarine Officer Pipeline Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Defense to carry out an exchange program for Australian submarine officers. Under this program, two such officers shall be selected each year to receive training and, after completing such training, be assigned to duty on an operational U.S. submarine at sea.

Sponsors: Sen. Blunt, Roy [R-MO]

Target Audience

Population: People impacted by the Australia-United States Submarine Officer Pipeline Act

Estimated Size: 200

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Submarine Officer (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's a great opportunity to enhance inter-operational capabilities and understand the working styles of our allies.
  • Introducing Australian officers onboard might initially challenge our routine, but it'll ultimately enhance our cooperative skills.
  • Personally, I'm excited about the cultural exchange and learning opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Department of Defense Policy Advisor (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Managing such international programs adds an extra layer of responsibility, but it aligns well with our strategic alliances.
  • The policy strengthens our ties with Australia, which is crucial given current geopolitical tensions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Submarine Crew Member (San Diego, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious about how Australians do things differently, but I don't think it'll impact my day-to-day very much.
  • As long as this doesn't increase my workload, I’m neutral about it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Navy Psychologist (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Cultural exchanges add a unique dimension to my work, and I'm optimistic about the positive impact on crew well-being.
  • Training international officers demands some extra effort but enriches our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Submarine Engineer (General Dynamics Electric Boat, Groton, CT)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is primarily operational in focus and doesn't directly influence my work.
  • Understanding foreign operational personnel can provide some insights into future design considerations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Defense Budget Analyst (Denver, CO)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Financially, this program is a small line item but reflects strategic alliances.
  • Doesn't affect my job directly, it's more a macro consideration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Submarine Navigator (Pearl Harbor, HI)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Could be a good opportunity to learn from our Australian counterparts.
  • Doesn't change much for my current duties.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

University Military History Professor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Seems like a significant policy for strengthening military alliances and understanding different naval practices.
  • I might incorporate this example into my curriculum.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Submarine Design Consultant (Groton, CT)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I doubt there will be any substantial influence on my consulting work.
  • It's essential for us to understand operational preferences of allied forces for future designs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Naval Support Staff (Kittery, ME)

Age: 31 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My job is all about logistics, so the integration of Australian officers won't change my role.
  • It’s always positive to see us working with allies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Key Considerations