Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4707

Bill Overview

Title: Buckeye National Scenic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the study of the feasibility of designating the Buckeye Trail as a national scenic trail. The Buckeye Trail is a system of trails creating a loop extending approximately 1,454 miles from Lake Erie to the Ohio River, through the farmland of northwest Ohio, the hills of Appalachia, the Black Hand sandstone cliffs of the Hocking Hills region, and the Bluegrass region of southwest Ohio.

Sponsors: Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH]

Target Audience

Population: People utilizing or living near the Buckeye Trail

Estimated Size: 11800000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Office Worker (Columbus, Ohio)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I love hiking and use the Buckeye Trail regularly. A national designation would probably bring more hikers and help maintain the trail better.
  • It might get more crowded, but better maintained with scenic outposts and info boards; can become a new hobby for others too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Small Business Owner (Cleveland, Ohio)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The designation can bring more tourists, which is great for my business. However, it depends on the execution and proper funding for trail infrastructure.
  • Also, crucial to educate tourists about protecting natural resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Freelance Writer (Cincinnati, Ohio)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Such a designation could give me more content ideas. Readers love stories on natural heritage and culture.
  • More facilities would be appreciated; however, commercialization should be controlled.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired (Dayton, Ohio)

Age: 53 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Designation is overdue; would encourage more volunteer groups and sponsorships to upgrade trail sections responsibly.
  • Hope they consider local feedback on plans to avoid disrupting current natural features.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Teacher (Toledo, Ohio)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A national scenic designation could enhance educational trips—it enables us to teach children about conservation through experience.
  • It’s important they don’t disrupt the trail's ecosystem in the name of tourists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired Nurse (Marietta, Ohio)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our local bird population might be disturbed by increased visitor numbers; however, proper management could mitigate such effects.
  • Potential community gatherings or citizen science projects could evolve through this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Student (Akron, Ohio)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The designation could mean more federal interest which could translate to better research opportunities.
  • Worried about ecological damage from poorly managed tourism, making it crucial to have quality management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

Accountant (Columbus, Ohio)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Realistically, I won't be affected much. Maybe some social events or news will mention it, but my routine won't change.
  • Nice to know it might make Ohio more appealing to nature enthusiasts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Outdoor Enthusiast (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although I live out of state, a national scenic designation could put the Buckeye Trail on my radar, as I'm always looking for new scenic trails.
  • Potential increased foot traffic might change the experience slightly but won’t deter me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Fisheries Biologist (Port Clinton, Ohio)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m curious about changes in local flora and fauna with increased tourism.
  • This could present both challenges and learning opportunities for ecological conservation, making it a double-edged sword.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $950000 (Low: $750000, High: $1150000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations