Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4685

Bill Overview

Title: Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2023

Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations for several federal departments and agencies, including the Department of the Treasury, the Executive Office of the President, the judiciary, the District of Columbia, and several independent agencies. The independent agencies funded in the bill include the Administrative Conference of the United States, the Barry Goldwater Scholarship and Excellence in Education Foundation, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Election Assistance Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Election Commission, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, the Federal Trade Commission, the General Services Administration, the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation, the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, the National Archives and Records Administration, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of Government Ethics, the Office of Personnel Management, the Office of Special Counsel, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, the Public Buildings Reform Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Selective Service System, the Small Business Administration, the U.S. Postal Service, and the U.S. Tax Court. The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.

Sponsors: Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Target Audience

Population: People directly employed by or contract with the affected federal agencies and citizens using their services

Estimated Size: 3500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Senior Analyst at the Consumer Product Safety Commission (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The appropriations ensure that my team can continue to work effectively to protect consumers.
  • The funding is crucial for updating our systems and responding to emerging product safety issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Legal Advisor at the Federal Election Commission (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stable funding is essential for ensuring fair and transparent elections.
  • This budget allows us to expand our advisory roles and support more state and local election efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 10 6
Year 20 9 6

Small Business Owner (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased funding for the SBA could improve access to necessary financial support.
  • Right now, the application processes are slow and often cumbersome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Retired Postal Worker (New York, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any support to USPS is welcomed, especially with all the operational challenges they face.
  • I worry about the future of postal services and their ability to meet demand.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Tech Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stable FCC regulations help for a predictable business environment.
  • Without proper funding, FCC actions can be unpredictable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

District Court Clerk (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Additional funding can mean better resources for our courts.
  • We really rely on updated technology to process cases efficiently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Financial Advisor (Houston, TX)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The SEC's operational efficiency is critical to market stability.
  • Appropriations help maintain investor confidence and market transparency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Civil Liberties Advocate (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about how budget restrictions could impair our oversight on privacy comes funding.
  • Adequate funding supports vital civil liberties protections and advocacy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Local Government Official (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Funding positively affects how federal agencies can assist with infrastructure and permitting.
  • Local projects can sometimes be delayed without efficient federal support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Academic Researcher (Boston, MA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Scholarships are critical for students in STEM disciplines, especially underrepresented groups.
  • Increasing funding can expand opportunities and reduce student debt.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $44000000000 (Low: $43000000000, High: $45000000000)

Year 2: $45200000000 (Low: $44000000000, High: $46200000000)

Year 3: $46400000000 (Low: $45200000000, High: $47400000000)

Year 5: $48000000000 (Low: $46700000000, High: $49200000000)

Year 10: $51000000000 (Low: $49600000000, High: $52300000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations