Bill Overview
Title: Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023
Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations to the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and several related agencies. The bill provides appropriations to DOT for the Office of the Secretary, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, the Maritime Administration, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and the Office of Inspector General. The bill provides appropriations to HUD for Management and Administration, Public and Indian Housing, Community Planning and Development, Housing Programs, the Federal Housing Administration, the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), Policy Development and Research, Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, the Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes, the Information Technology Fund, and the Office of Inspector General. The bill also provides appropriations to several related agencies, including the Access Board, the Federal Maritime Commission, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Office of Inspector General, the National Transportation Safety Board, the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, the Surface Transportation Board, and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. The bill includes several provisions that establish requirements and authorities for HUD's programs and activities related to disaster relief and recovery. Additionally, the bill sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Sponsors: Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]
Target Audience
Population: People using public transportation, federal housing assistance, or affected by related infrastructure.
Estimated Size: 50000000
- This bill affects both the Department of Transportation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, impacting sectors such as air travel, highway safety, public housing, and mortgage insurance.
- The bill provides funding for federal agencies responsible for infrastructure essential to economic and functional daily life for many individuals, including transportation and housing.
- People across the United States who rely on public housing and federally insured mortgages are directly targeted.
- Users of public transportation, highways, and air travel will be affected due to funding directed towards maintaining and developing these facilities.
- This bill includes funding for safety administration offices, which impacts the general public through improved transportation safety measures.
Reasoning
- The policy directly benefits individuals reliant on public transportation and public housing, thus people in urban areas may see more significant effects.
- The budget constraints require efficient allocation to maximize benefits and touch a wide demographic.
- Rural areas may see less impact due to less reliance on extensive public transportation networks.
- The impact on transportation safety administration will indirectly affect a wide range of the population by potentially reducing accidents and improving safety measures.
- The bill's support for HUD will impact low-income families, potentially reducing homelessness and improving housing conditions.
Simulated Interviews
Public School Teacher (New York City, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am hopeful that the increase in public transport funding will improve the service quality.
- Affordability of housing is a big concern for me, any improvement in HUD's services would be beneficial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Software Developer (Austin, TX)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm concerned about traffic congestion. Improvements in highway infrastructure can be a boon.
- I hope the policy supports sustainable development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Retired (Rural Tennessee)
Age: 68 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I would like to see better road safety measures implemented with this funding.
- In rural areas, federal housing policies have little impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Nurse (Chicago, IL)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm worried about my safety during commutes; more funding should mean safer and more reliable services.
- I depend on public housing support and hope for better living conditions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Freelance Artist (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased support for transport will make it more efficient to get to gigs.
- It would be wonderful if housing assistance means I spend less on rent.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Taxi Driver (Miami, FL)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm hoping for smoother roads and better congestion management.
- The impact on gas prices due to policies would be crucial for me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Better transportation means more time for studies and work.
- I'm thankful for federal support which helps in managing my housing expenses.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Logistics Coordinator (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 37 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Transportation improvements can streamline shipping logistics in my field.
- Housing affordability is a major concern and any easing would help.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 61 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope the policy supports better jobs and faster commute times.
- Public transport improvements can open more job opportunities for me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Small Business Owner (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improved road conditions would reduce delivery and transportation hassle.
- I am optimistic about any aid that can help with disaster recovery and property damage.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $30000000000 (Low: $28000000000, High: $32000000000)
Year 2: $31000000000 (Low: $29000000000, High: $33000000000)
Year 3: $32000000000 (Low: $30000000000, High: $34000000000)
Year 5: $34000000000 (Low: $32000000000, High: $36000000000)
Year 10: $38000000000 (Low: $36000000000, High: $40000000000)
Year 100: $60000000000 (Low: $58000000000, High: $62000000000)
Key Considerations
- Inflationary pressures over the fiscal year could affect the real value of appropriations, requiring potential adjustments.
- Coordination between multiple federal agencies under DOT and HUD ensures adequate implementation of the funds, impacting infrastructure improvements, housing policy, and disaster relief.
- The ability of federal funds to leverage additional state and local funding could amplify impact in specific regions.
- Potential delays in project deployment could affect the expected outcomes of appropriations.