Bill Overview
Title: Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023
Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations to the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the science agencies, and several related agencies. The bill provides appropriations to the Department of Commerce for the International Trade Administration, the Bureau of Industry and Security, the Economic Development Administration, the Minority Business Development Agency, Economic and Statistical Analysis, the Bureau of the Census, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Departmental Management. The bill provides appropriations to DOJ for General Administration; the Executive Office for Immigration Review; the Office of Inspector General; the U.S. Parole Commission; Legal Activities; the U.S. Marshals Service; the National Security Division; Interagency Law Enforcement; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; and the Federal Prison System. The bill also provides appropriations to DOJ for state and local law enforcement activities, including the Office on Violence Against Women, the Office of Justice Programs, and Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). The bill provides appropriations for science agencies, including the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Space Council, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation. The bill provides appropriations to related agencies, including the Commission on Civil Rights, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Legal Services Corporation, the Marine Mammal Commission, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and the State Justice Institute. The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Sponsors: Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals affected by the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023
Estimated Size: 300000000
- The bill impacts a wide range of departments and agencies within the U.S. federal government, including Commerce, Justice, and Science departments.
- Various subdivisions within these departments, such as the International Trade Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, will be impacted, which in turn serves various sectors and individuals in the population.
- With appropriations to the DOJ for state and local enforcement, the legislation will influence law enforcement activities at multiple levels, affecting the safety and justice pertaining to communities across the U.S.
- Appropriations for science agencies, such as NASA and the National Science Foundation, will affect research and technological advancement, thus impacting innovators, scientists, and educators, along with the general public who benefits from scientific progress.
- The inclusion of bodies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission indicates an impact on workers' rights and employment equality, touching the lives of many Americans.
- Funding for the Legal Services Corporation suggests that legal assistance services for individuals with low income will be affected.
- The bill also factors in international trade aspects, which affect jobs and industries involved in global trade transactions.
Reasoning
- This policy impacts a wide range of agencies, suggesting varied effects across the population. For instance, increases in funding for local law enforcement might enhance community safety perceptions, impacting wellbeing.
- Increased support for scientific agencies could inspire advances in technology and education, aiding researchers, educators, and students. This could improve long-term wellbeing in communities centered around scientific progress.
- Those involved in international trade may see benefits from this policy, as appropriations are designated for the International Trade Administration, potentially stabilizing jobs and increasing economic prosperity.
- Increased funding for the EEOC and related agencies might improve workplace equality, which could benefit workers across various industries and increase their overall job satisfaction and wellbeing.
- People are affected differently based on their interaction with these departments and the trickle-down effects of policy implementations that influence societal structures such as safety, economic stability, and opportunities.
Simulated Interviews
Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone working in tech, I believe increased investments in the National Science Foundation and NASA could drive further innovation in technology.
- Support for international trade will help sustain my company, directly impacting my job security positively.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Small Business Owner (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see both positives and negatives. More support for the Department of Commerce is good for business, but I'm concerned about the restrictions that come with it.
- I hope that the funds lead to meaningful assistance for small businesses like mine.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Research Scientist (Houston, TX)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding for NASA and NSF is excellent news, providing more stability for research projects.
- These appropriations could lead to job security and innovation in scientific fields.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Retired (Cleveland, OH)
Age: 61 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Allocating funds to the DOJ and local law enforcement could improve public safety, which is a top concern for me.
- It's reassuring to see resources directed towards crime reduction and community policing.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Police Officer (Chicago, IL)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding for the DOJ and COPS is necessary for enhancing our capabilities and improving community relations.
- Hoping this leads to better resources and training, impacting our ability to serve effectively.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Civil Rights Lawyer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased allocation to the EEOC should enable more decisive actions against workplace discrimination.
- I'm hopeful for improvements in employment equality and support for marginalized communities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Graduate Student (Pittsburgh, PA)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Funding for NOAA can enrich research opportunities in climate science, directly benefiting my academic and career prospects.
- I am optimistic about increased job opportunities in the field due to this policy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
International Trade Analyst (Miami, FL)
Age: 43 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I anticipate that the support for the International Trade Administration will stabilize markets and assist in trade negotiations.
- These changes could positively impact economic conditions and my own job security.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Public Defender (Austin, TX)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More resources for the DOJ could lead to fairer trials and improved circumstances for defendants.
- I'm hopeful for reforms and better services for those in the legal system.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 58 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't see a direct impact from this bill on my job, but improved economic conditions might create more stability.
- Hoping for better trade policies that protect manufacturing jobs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Year 2: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Year 3: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Year 5: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Year 10: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Year 100: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)
Key Considerations
- The appropriations cover pivotal sectors and departments with significant influence on national security, economic growth, and civil rights.
- Economic uncertainties and inflation variations can affect the exact outlays and benefits of these appropriations.
- The breadth of agencies involved indicates varied and widespread impact across various population sectors and geographies.