Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4664

Bill Overview

Title: Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023

Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations to the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the science agencies, and several related agencies. The bill provides appropriations to the Department of Commerce for the International Trade Administration, the Bureau of Industry and Security, the Economic Development Administration, the Minority Business Development Agency, Economic and Statistical Analysis, the Bureau of the Census, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Departmental Management. The bill provides appropriations to DOJ for General Administration; the Executive Office for Immigration Review; the Office of Inspector General; the U.S. Parole Commission; Legal Activities; the U.S. Marshals Service; the National Security Division; Interagency Law Enforcement; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; and the Federal Prison System. The bill also provides appropriations to DOJ for state and local law enforcement activities, including the Office on Violence Against Women, the Office of Justice Programs, and Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). The bill provides appropriations for science agencies, including the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Space Council, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation. The bill provides appropriations to related agencies, including the Commission on Civil Rights, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Legal Services Corporation, the Marine Mammal Commission, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and the State Justice Institute. The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.

Sponsors: Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals affected by the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023

Estimated Size: 300000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As someone working in tech, I believe increased investments in the National Science Foundation and NASA could drive further innovation in technology.
  • Support for international trade will help sustain my company, directly impacting my job security positively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Small Business Owner (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see both positives and negatives. More support for the Department of Commerce is good for business, but I'm concerned about the restrictions that come with it.
  • I hope that the funds lead to meaningful assistance for small businesses like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Research Scientist (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased funding for NASA and NSF is excellent news, providing more stability for research projects.
  • These appropriations could lead to job security and innovation in scientific fields.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Retired (Cleveland, OH)

Age: 61 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Allocating funds to the DOJ and local law enforcement could improve public safety, which is a top concern for me.
  • It's reassuring to see resources directed towards crime reduction and community policing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Police Officer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased funding for the DOJ and COPS is necessary for enhancing our capabilities and improving community relations.
  • Hoping this leads to better resources and training, impacting our ability to serve effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Civil Rights Lawyer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased allocation to the EEOC should enable more decisive actions against workplace discrimination.
  • I'm hopeful for improvements in employment equality and support for marginalized communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Graduate Student (Pittsburgh, PA)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Funding for NOAA can enrich research opportunities in climate science, directly benefiting my academic and career prospects.
  • I am optimistic about increased job opportunities in the field due to this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

International Trade Analyst (Miami, FL)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I anticipate that the support for the International Trade Administration will stabilize markets and assist in trade negotiations.
  • These changes could positively impact economic conditions and my own job security.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Public Defender (Austin, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More resources for the DOJ could lead to fairer trials and improved circumstances for defendants.
  • I'm hopeful for reforms and better services for those in the legal system.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see a direct impact from this bill on my job, but improved economic conditions might create more stability.
  • Hoping for better trade policies that protect manufacturing jobs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Year 2: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Year 3: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Year 5: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Year 10: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Year 100: $85000000000 (Low: $80000000000, High: $90000000000)

Key Considerations