Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4659

Bill Overview

Title: Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023

Description: This bill provides FY2023 appropriations to the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education; and related agencies. The bill provides appropriations to the Department of Labor for the Employment and Training Administration, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the Wage and Hour Division, the Office of Labor-Management Standards, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Office of Disability Employment Policy, and Departmental Management. The bill provides appropriations to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Substance Use and Mental Health Services Administration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Administration for Children and Families, the Administration for Community Living, and the Office of the Secretary. Additionally, the bill provides emergency supplemental appropriations to HHS for activities to address the coronavirus or any disease with the potential for creating a pandemic. The bill provides appropriations to the Department of Education for Education for the Disadvantaged; Impact Aid; School Improvement Programs; Indian Education; Innovation and Improvement; Safe Schools and Citizenship Education; English Language Acquisition; Special Education; Rehabilitation Services; Special Institutions for Persons with Disabilities; Career, Technical, and Adult Education; Student Financial Assistance; Student Aid Administration; Higher Education; Howard University; the College Housing and Academic Facilities Loan Program; the Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account; the Institute of Education Sciences; and Departmental Management. The bill also provides appropriations to several related agencies, including the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, the Corporation for National and Community Service, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, the National Council on Disability, the National Labor Relations Board, the National Mediation Board, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the Railroad Retirement Board, and the Social Security Administration. The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.

Sponsors: Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals in the United States relying on federal services and benefits related to labor, health, education, and public services

Estimated Size: 270000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe the policy will improve resources in schools, potentially leading to better education for students in special education.
  • Increased Medicare support is vital for my health needs.
  • Support for labor unions through this policy is important for fair wages.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 6 3

Healthcare worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The funding for healthcare and safety offices means better working conditions and resources.
  • More aid in community healthcare services will benefit my patients and my work quality.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 75 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful the policy will reduce my out-of-pocket healthcare expenses.
  • Funding for Medicare is essential for seniors like myself.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

College student (Austin, TX)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy ensuring financial aid and support for education is critical for my ability to graduate.
  • Increased support for higher education will help students like me reduce debt.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 6 3

Factory worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic that the policy will improve safety regulations and compensation benefits.
  • Support for labor standards and safety can enhance workplace environments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Single mother (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy should provide better healthcare access for me and my child.
  • Support for child and family services is crucial for working families.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Freelance Graphic Designer (Portland, OR)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased support for health services is beneficial since I rely on market insurance.
  • As a freelancer, economic stability is vital, and this policy might help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Nonprofit Coordinator (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 34 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Support for educational grants could increase opportunities for the youth I work with.
  • Funding for community services can enhance our programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Librarian (Denver, CO)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about having sufficient funds in retirement, hoping for policy enhancement on social security.
  • Support for community outreach initiatives is essential in my field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

College student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Federal support for student loans is vital for continuing my education without financial strain.
  • Improved educational resources contribute to better learning outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Year 2: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Year 3: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Year 5: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Year 10: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Year 100: $1720000000000 (Low: $1690000000000, High: $1750000000000)

Key Considerations