Bill Overview
Title: Student Apprenticeship Act of 2022
Description: 2022 This bill requires the Department of Education to award grants to certain partnerships to enable the development and implementation of a postsecondary apprenticeship program. An eligible partnership must consist of (1) at least one institution of higher education, (2) at least one individual employer, and (3) a workforce intermediary (an entity that demonstrates expertise in fostering partnerships in order to support postsecondary apprenticeship programs). Such partnership may also include other entities such as a state agency responsible for administering career and technical education, a labor organization, or an economic development agency. A partnership that receives a grant must use the funds to develop and implement a postsecondary apprenticeship program in a high-skill, high-wage, and in-demand industry sector or occupation. Additionally, an apprenticeship shall qualify as a work-study program through which a student apprentice is eligible for federal financial assistance.
Sponsors: Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Target Audience
Population: Postsecondary students interested in apprenticeships
Estimated Size: 2500000
- The bill aims to develop and implement postsecondary apprenticeship programs.
- Each program must be in high-skill, high-wage, and in-demand sectors, aiming to improve employment readiness of students.
- Student apprentices in participating programs will benefit from both education and practical work experience.
- Institutions of higher education will have new resources and opportunities to integrate apprenticeships into their programs.
- Employers participating in such apprenticeships will have access to educated and motivated student workers.
- Workforce intermediaries and possibly state agencies will play significant roles in implementing these apprenticeship programs.
Reasoning
- The policy targets postsecondary students interested in developing practical skills alongside their academic education.
- Grants will support programs in high-skill and high-wage industries, meaning potential impact varies by student's field of study.
- The budget constraints will limit the number of programs and students who can participate each year.
- The potential benefits include increased employability and reduced educational costs for students in the program.
- Those not directly participating may not experience significant changes in their wellbeing scores.
- Commonness is estimated based on typical student ratios interested in apprenticeships and expected impacts of new policies.
Simulated Interviews
Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 19 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm very interested in the apprenticeship because it could integrate perfectly with my part-time job.
- Financial assistance through the apprenticeship would help me devote more time to my studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Student (Chicago, IL)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The apprenticeship program in renewable energy would be a perfect fit for me.
- It would provide me with valuable hands-on experience.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Vocational training counselor (Rural Kentucky)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could increase funding and opportunities for students who often struggle to find work-study options.
- There might be more placements in high-demand vocational sectors.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Graduate Student (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I doubt I'd qualify since I'm not in a technical field, but if there's any overlap with tech entrepreneurship, I might benefit.
- It's promising for those who can join, but I'm unsure about the business sector inclusion.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Working Student (Austin, TX)
Age: 25 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Balancing work and study is challenging, an apprenticeship could lessen financial strain.
- Hands-on experience in IT would enhance my skills for better job opportunities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Student (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 21 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The program could solidify my career path in tech analytics.
- However, given the competitive nature, I'm unsure if I'll benefit directly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Part-time Lecturer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The program offers a chance to collaborate with industries, enhancing course relevance.
- I'm excited about potential curriculum updates to include apprenticeship components.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Education Policy Analyst (Boston, MA)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy aligns well with current trends in education.
- It may enhance students' future job prospects significantly if implemented correctly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Vocational Student (Miami, FL)
Age: 23 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could be a great way to enter the automotive industry with practical experience.
- I've been looking for something like this to move into skilled labor.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
High School Senior (Detroit, MI)
Age: 18 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If the apprenticeship program includes healthcare, it might be a great opportunity as I transition to college.
- Scholarships and apprenticeships could significantly reduce my education costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 2: $950000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1150000000)
Year 3: $900000000 (Low: $750000000, High: $1100000000)
Year 5: $850000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $1050000000)
Year 10: $800000000 (Low: $650000000, High: $1000000000)
Year 100: $700000000 (Low: $550000000, High: $900000000)
Key Considerations
- The effectiveness of the programs largely depends on the ability of partnerships to develop high-quality apprenticeship models.
- Government oversight and efficient allocation of grants are crucial to minimize misuse of funds and ensure effective implementation.
- Economic conditions may influence employer participation in apprenticeship partnerships, especially in fluctuating high-demand industries.