Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4657

Bill Overview

Title: Investor Justice Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes grants for investor advocacy clinics. To qualify, clinics associated with a law school or a tax-exempt organization must provide free legal representation to investors with securities arbitration and mediation claims pending before a registered national securities association.

Sponsors: Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Target Audience

Population: Retail investors with securities arbitration and mediation claims

Estimated Size: 200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don’t have the resources to fight a big brokerage firm on my own.
  • If I could get legal help, I might actually have a chance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having professional legal support would greatly ease my stress and effort in pursuing this claim.
  • I can’t afford to lose more money on legal fees without a guarantee of success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Software Developer (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Accessing free legal aid means I can hold my brokerage accountable without affecting my savings for legal fees.
  • It's reassuring to know there might be support for people like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Freelance Graphic Designer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The stress of managing an arbitration without proper legal advice weighs heavy.
  • Having law school clinics available would be a relief.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Junior Financial Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m wary of entering legal disputes because they seem daunting.
  • Free legal assistance would help me resolve issues more confidently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Independent Filmmaker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 41 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Legal help would be invaluable in promoting ethically aware investment practices.
  • Currently feel a bit outmatched by the financial institution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Healthcare Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Clarity and support in legal matters would lessen my anxiety and financial strain.
  • I don’t have much disposable income for legal battles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Construction Worker (Denver, CO)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Legal aid from the clinics would help me reclaim some dignity and possibly my lost funds.
  • I’ve felt hopeless in pursuing this case.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Retired Teacher (Boston, MA)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being able to access legal support would be a huge relief as it levels the playing field somewhat.
  • I’ve felt ignored by the investment firm.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Accountant (Houston, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe in resolving issues on my own, but free legal help would certainly offload some burden.
  • It would give me more confidence against well-resourced platforms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $44000000, High: $64000000)

Year 5: $57000000 (Low: $47000000, High: $67000000)

Year 10: $61000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $72000000)

Year 100: $61000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $72000000)

Key Considerations