Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4648

Bill Overview

Title: Pacific Islands Embassies Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of State to establish U.S. embassies in Vanuatu, Kiribati, and Tonga.

Sponsors: Sen. Ossoff, Jon [D-GA]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals residing in Vanuatu, Kiribati, and Tonga

Estimated Size: 10000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Diplomat (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The establishment of embassies will enhance our diplomatic footprint in the Pacific region.
  • These embassies are crucial for improving our bilateral relations and providing critical services to U.S. citizens and businesses in the area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 10 8

Travel vlogger (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having embassies in these islands means easier access to consular services, which is important for travelers like me.
  • It might also boost tourism infrastructure, beneficial for my work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Import business owner (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could facilitate smoother business operations with these countries through improved diplomacy.
  • Any reduction in red tape is a plus for my business operations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

College student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 19 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's good for the U.S. to have more diplomatic presence in regions often overlooked.
  • Learning about this policy could provide case studies or internships related to foreign relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Energy consultant (Dallas, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Greater diplomatic presence might open new avenues for U.S. energy projects in these regions.
  • It won't change much immediately, but could have long-term benefits for business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Travel agency owner (New York, NY)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having embassies there might make travel to the Pacific Islands more appealing to American tourists.
  • This could indirectly boost my travel agency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Economics professor (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's beneficial for academic analysis to have more on-ground diplomatic representation in these areas.
  • The direct impact on most citizens might be limited, but it's significant for U.S. strategic interests.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Expatriate liaison officer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will make my job easier by enhancing support for American citizens abroad.
  • It should facilitate better cultural exchanges and support networks for expats.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not directly affected, I welcome improved diplomatic relations that support international development.
  • Investing in these embassies could lead to better developmental collaboration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Graduate student (Portland, OR)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These embassies could create more career opportunities for students like me.
  • Understanding U.S. diplomatic strategies could help me prepare for future roles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)

Year 2: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 3: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 10: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 100: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Key Considerations