Bill Overview
Title: Clean Energy Jobs Act of 2022
Description: This bill directs the Department of Energy, in consultation with the Department of Labor and the Department of Education, to establish a comprehensive nationwide program to improve education and workforce development for jobs in energy-related industries, with emphasis on increasing the number of skilled individuals from underrepresented groups trained to work in those jobs.
Sponsors: Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM]
Target Audience
Population: People working in the global energy-related industries
Estimated Size: 7300000
- The bill focuses on improving education and workforce development for jobs in energy-related industries.
- It places emphasis on increasing the number of skilled individuals from underrepresented groups trained to work in the energy sector.
- The energy sector workforce worldwide includes sectors like renewable energy, oil, gas, coal, and nuclear industries.
Reasoning
- The Clean Energy Jobs Act is specifically designed to benefit individuals seeking to enter or advance in energy-related industries, particularly underrepresented groups like minorities and women, who might otherwise face barriers to entry.
- Given the large budget, it is expected that the policy will reach a significant number of people within the target population, but not all will feel significant impacts in the short term.
- Wellbeing impacts will likely vary based on an individual's current job satisfaction, potential for advancement, and current socio-economic status.
- Training and development may take varying amounts of time to reflect in improved job satisfaction and wellbeing.
- For some individuals, particularly those already employed in the sector but in lower-wage positions, the impact may reflect in long-term gains rather than immediate change.
Simulated Interviews
Solar Panel Technician (Austin, TX)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the program is great for people like me who are already trying to move up in the industry.
- Having more support and seeing more women and minorities in leadership roles would be encouraging.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Wind Energy Consultant (Charlotte, NC)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's an ambitious move, if executed well, this could open doors for diversified talent.
- Seeing diversity in the workforce builds trust with communities we work in.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Student (Detroit, MI)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is exactly what we need to break into the energy fields.
- Opportunities for scholarships and training through this bill would be massive.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Oil Rig Worker (Houston, TX)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It might not affect folks like me initially, but competition will be a worry if more enter the field.
- It's always good to see us moving towards sustainable options.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Renewable Energy Project Coordinator (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 12.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The proposed policy sounds like a significant step forward for inclusivity.
- More resources could mean real progress for minorities and underrepresented groups.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Coal Miner (Pittsburgh, PA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Hopeful that this might bring shifts to sustainable energy jobs if coal goes further out of favor.
- Retraining is daunting at my age, but helpful if managed well.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Hydroelectric Energy Analyst (Seattle, WA)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this as having a positive impact on our projects.
- If the community members gain skills, they can take on more leadership roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Nuclear Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see potential for great improvements in workforce quality with this change.
- This could help diversify our talent pool significantly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 9 |
Energy Sector Educator (Chicago, IL)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone who's seen students struggle to break into this field, this policy sounds promising.
- Support systems and job placements are essential.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Electrical Engineer (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think that focusing on education, especially for minorities, is vital for our community's success.
- The policy has potential to make a real difference if implemented properly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 2: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $620000000)
Year 3: $550000000 (Low: $450000000, High: $650000000)
Year 5: $600000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $700000000)
Year 10: $700000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $800000000)
Year 100: $700000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $800000000)
Key Considerations
- The bill's success largely depends on effective coordination between the Department of Energy, Labor, and Education.
- Scalability of educational programs and workforce training in diverse geographic locations is crucial to reaching the target population.
- The sustainability of the bill's objectives post-funding period is essential to evaluate long-term benefits.
- Measurement of success indicators, such as employment rate changes and skill improvement metrics, is critical.