Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4600

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to require the reimposition of sanctions with respect to the FARC.

Description: This bill directs the President to designate the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) as a foreign terrorist organization and impose sanctions on FARC and any foreign person affiliated with FARC.

Sponsors: Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: People directly or indirectly associated with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)

Estimated Size: 1000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Human Rights Advocate (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have mixed feelings about this policy. On one hand, it might curb some illegal activities connected to FARC. On the other, sanctions can hurt innocent people in Colombia and potentially affect familial ties.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 8

Import/Export Business Owner (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These sanctions can be cumbersome, potentially creating more bureaucratic hurdles for legal trade, impacting business operations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Government Security Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a positive step for US national security interests, making it harder for FARC to operate internationally. However, we need to ensure it doesn’t affect America’s diplomatic relations negatively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

NGO Field Worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Top-down sanctions like these can sometimes unintentionally worsen conditions for ordinary people, though they aim to undermine hostile groups.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 8

Colombian Immigrant (Dallas, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m worried these sanctions might complicate sending money to my family or affect their local economy severely.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 8

Retired (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think these measures are necessary to protect national security, though it probably won’t affect me directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Corporate Lawyer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sanctions enforcement is part of my job, so clarity and precision in these laws are crucial to avoid business disruptions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

College Student (Boston, MA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m curious about how this move will influence Colombia’s political landscape and US foreign policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired Military (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While these are necessary actions for security reasons, they should be carefully monitored to ensure they are achieving the desired outcomes without counterproductive results.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Philanthropist (Houston, TX)

Age: 53 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These sanctions could impact philanthropic efforts if they cause broader economic challenges in the regions where we operate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 8 9
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $14000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $19000000)

Year 3: $13000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $18000000)

Year 5: $12000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $17000000)

Year 10: $10500000 (Low: $6000000, High: $15000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $8000000)

Key Considerations