Bill Overview
Title: Preventing Abuse and Neglect of Vulnerable Americans Act of 2022
Description: 2022 This bill requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to publish specified information on its website relating to deficiencies of Medicaid intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities, including information regarding inspections, complaints, and administrative actions. The CMS must also (1) develop and publish a standardized complaint form for such facilities; and (2) convene an advisory council to recommend ways to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation in such facilities. The bill also allows Medicaid and Medicare providers (e.g., skilled nursing facilities) to access, through the National Practitioner Data Bank, disciplinary information for affiliated physicians and other health care practitioners, as reported by state licensing authorities.
Sponsors: Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities in the US
Estimated Size: 400000
- The bill focuses on individuals with intellectual disabilities in Medicaid intermediate care facilities.
- The improvements in complaint processes and transparency will directly affect individuals residing in these facilities and their families.
- In the US, it is estimated that there are over 6 million people with intellectual disabilities, though not all reside in Medicaid intermediate care facilities.
- Not all individuals with intellectual disabilities are in care facilities covered by Medicaid, but a significant portion are, especially those requiring intensive care.
- The bill also addresses healthcare practitioners by allowing certain data access, indirectly impacting care quality.
- The American population is directly impacted since the bill affects US-based care facilities and citizens.
- Considering family members and caregivers who are involved in the care of those with intellectual disabilities, the broader community affected is larger.
Reasoning
- 1. The policy directly affects individuals residing in Medicaid intermediate care facilities for intellectual disabilities. Given the requirement for CMS to publish facility deficiencies and provide a standardized complaint form, both patients and families are anticipated to feel safer and more informed about their care environment.
- 2. The advisory council's role in preventing abuse and neglect, while indirectly benefiting residents, may have a more substantial future impact, thereby affecting longer-term wellbeing scores.
- 3. Ensuring healthcare practitioners' disciplinary information access could lead to improved care quality, indirectly boosting confidence in received care among patients and families over the years.
- 4. Estimated budget limits suggest an initially conservative implementation aligning with setting up databases and forming advisory councils, leading to gradual improvements in care quality and policy reach.
- 5. Family members, caregivers, and health workers form a broader stakeholder group that could see a slight rise in wellbeing perceptions as accountability and transparency increase within these facilities.
- 6. Awareness of policy changes and their benefits might take some time to permeate through community stakeholders, resulting in delayed wellbeing improvements.
Simulated Interviews
Caregiver (Ohio)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm cautiously optimistic about the new bill. Anything that helps ensure my son's safety and wellbeing is a step in the right direction.
- I'm glad to see more transparency is being promoted. It helps me stay informed about the facility's track record.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Healthcare Worker (Texas)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's good to have policies that keep facilities in check, but it's also essential to provide adequate support to healthcare workers handling these tough situations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Facility Administrator (California)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I welcome additional oversight and transparency, but the implementation process will dictate the operational efficiency and potential burdens on resources.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Student (New York)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's reassuring to see steps being taken to protect vulnerable individuals. As someone who volunteers, I think this could improve conditions where my brother might end up one day.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Retired (Florida)
Age: 72 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's been a long time coming for such oversight. During my career, I saw first-hand the need for better reporting and complaint mechanisms.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Disability Rights Advocate (Illinois)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A positive move towards accountability, but consistent enforcement and genuine improvements in facility operations remain crucial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
Social Worker (Colorado)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Standardized complaint forms will hopefully facilitate quicker and more effective responses to issues. I'm hopeful for positive change.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Journalist (Georgia)
Age: 54 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a journalist, I see this as a transparency success. As a citizen, I hope it can truly make a difference for vulnerable groups.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Parent Advocate (Michigan)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This bill is a victory for those defending the rights of individuals like my child. It empowers us to demand better care standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Retired Healthcare Supervisor (Oregon)
Age: 66 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More structured complaint processes and transparency should have long been standard practice. It's a needed change.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 5: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The bill primarily involves transparency and administrative reforms rather than direct economic or financial policies.
- The full impact on vulnerable individuals and care quality improvements may be observed more qualitively than quantatively.
- CMS's role in implementation may require precise allocation and effectively managed budgets to prevent cost overruns.