Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4593

Bill Overview

Title: Preventing Abuse and Neglect of Vulnerable Americans Act of 2022

Description: 2022 This bill requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to publish specified information on its website relating to deficiencies of Medicaid intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities, including information regarding inspections, complaints, and administrative actions. The CMS must also (1) develop and publish a standardized complaint form for such facilities; and (2) convene an advisory council to recommend ways to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation in such facilities. The bill also allows Medicaid and Medicare providers (e.g., skilled nursing facilities) to access, through the National Practitioner Data Bank, disciplinary information for affiliated physicians and other health care practitioners, as reported by state licensing authorities.

Sponsors: Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities in the US

Estimated Size: 400000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Caregiver (Ohio)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm cautiously optimistic about the new bill. Anything that helps ensure my son's safety and wellbeing is a step in the right direction.
  • I'm glad to see more transparency is being promoted. It helps me stay informed about the facility's track record.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Healthcare Worker (Texas)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good to have policies that keep facilities in check, but it's also essential to provide adequate support to healthcare workers handling these tough situations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Facility Administrator (California)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome additional oversight and transparency, but the implementation process will dictate the operational efficiency and potential burdens on resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Student (New York)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's reassuring to see steps being taken to protect vulnerable individuals. As someone who volunteers, I think this could improve conditions where my brother might end up one day.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired (Florida)

Age: 72 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's been a long time coming for such oversight. During my career, I saw first-hand the need for better reporting and complaint mechanisms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Disability Rights Advocate (Illinois)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A positive move towards accountability, but consistent enforcement and genuine improvements in facility operations remain crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Social Worker (Colorado)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Standardized complaint forms will hopefully facilitate quicker and more effective responses to issues. I'm hopeful for positive change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Journalist (Georgia)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a journalist, I see this as a transparency success. As a citizen, I hope it can truly make a difference for vulnerable groups.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Parent Advocate (Michigan)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill is a victory for those defending the rights of individuals like my child. It empowers us to demand better care standards.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired Healthcare Supervisor (Oregon)

Age: 66 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More structured complaint processes and transparency should have long been standard practice. It's a needed change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 5: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations