Bill Overview
Title: Extension of Department of Homeland Security Other Transaction Authority Act of 2022
Description: This bill extends through FY2024 the authority of the Department of Homeland Security to carry out a research and development projects pilot program.
Sponsors: Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Target Audience
Population: People connected to DHS R&D projects and general US population for security enhancements
Estimated Size: 331900000
- The bill affects the operations within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), specifically related to research and development programs.
- The DHS employs a significant number of people, whose work could be directly influenced by continued or new R&D projects.
- Businesses and organizations engaged in contracts or working partnerships with DHS for R&D purposes will be directly impacted.
- Advancements and innovations from these R&D projects can potentially impact the lives of the entire population by improving national security measures.
Reasoning
- This policy extends the research and development capabilities of DHS, which could potentially enhance national security, thereby affecting almost everyone in the US indirectly.
- However, the direct impact of this policy will be most felt by the employees of DHS, the contractors, and R&D professionals working directly on these projects.
- The allocated budget is relatively modest compared to the entire US population, so significant direct impacts will be concentrated among those directly working on or with the DHS R&D projects.
Simulated Interviews
R&D Project Manager at DHS (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The extension of the project would mean job security for me and my team.
- With continued funding, we can improve our security measures further.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Cybersecurity Analyst (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Extension means potential for more projects and job stability.
- Possibility for innovation in cybersecurity is exciting.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Retired (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe the continued research will enhance national security overall.
- Not directly affected, but it's good for peace of mind.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Dallas, TX)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Extension could mean more opportunities for startups like mine to partner with DHS.
- Could lead to job growth if more contracts are available.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Academic Researcher in Security Studies (Boston, MA)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continued funding extends my research potential.
- The outputs could significantly influence national security policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Security Consultant (Houston, TX)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- New projects can mean more work for consultants like me.
- Indirect impact but could lead to increased demand for security assessments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Software Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continuation of this program might lead to new innovative projects.
- Job positions in emerging fields will be more secure.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Public School Teacher (Denver, CO)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Extension might result in a more stable environment regarding national security.
- General public impact but not seen in my daily life yet.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Logistics Coordinator (Chicago, IL)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any government extension could increase our business opportunities.
- However, the direct impact on me is not significant.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Graduate Student in Political Science (Portland, OR)
Age: 27 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This extension could provide more data for research and understanding government priorities.
- Interest in long-term effects but immediate impact on personal life is minimal.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 2: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $620000000)
Year 3: $540000000 (Low: $440000000, High: $640000000)
Year 5: $580000000 (Low: $470000000, High: $680000000)
Year 10: $640000000 (Low: $530000000, High: $740000000)
Year 100: $950000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1050000000)
Key Considerations
- The cost estimates are contingent on the scope and scale of R&D projects approved under this extension.
- Potential geopolitical developments may alter R&D priorities and their associated costs.
- Long-term economic benefits from security improvements and technological advancements should be considered beyond direct and immediate costs.