Bill Overview
Title: Month of Life Celebration Act
Description: This bill adds the Month of Life to the statutory list of patriotic and national observances. It also requires the President to annually issue a proclamation that (1) reaffirms the dignity of human life, (2) supports life inside and outside the womb and the life of the pregnant individual, and (3) commits to assist parents and children.
Sponsors: Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]
Target Audience
Population: People globally who value or are affected by dignity of life policies
Estimated Size: 331000000
- The bill focuses on reaffirming the dignity of human life, which is a universal concept impacting all individuals.
- It specifically highlights life inside and outside the womb, targeting pregnant individuals, their unborn children, and parents.
- The proclamation commits to supporting parents and children, indicating a focus on families.
Reasoning
- We must consider several diverse perspectives and life situations to capture a wide array of possible reactions to the policy.
- The policy's emphasis on the dignity of life is likely to resonate with certain religious and cultural groups who are strongly pro-life, while others may feel indifferent or opposed due to differing views on reproductive rights.
- The budgetary constraints imply that any direct financial or material assistance that may derive from such policies in the proclamation would be limited, impacting the overall substantial change they can make.
- People across various socio-economic backgrounds will perceive the impact differently, based on their immediate circumstances and current life satisfaction levels.
Simulated Interviews
Teacher (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think having a month dedicated to life can foster positive conversations, especially in communities like mine.
- As someone who values life, this helps highlight issues important to me, although it doesn't directly solve challenges like medical costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Farmer (Rural Kansas)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The proclamation is good but symbolic. Practically, I don't see real change in my day-to-day life.
- It could boost morale in some circles, but what we need is more economic support.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Software Engineer (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel indifferent towards national proclamations on such matters.
- Real life work-life balance issues for parenting in tech are bigger for me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired CEO (San Diego, CA)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The message of dignity is positive, but what I'm more interested in is actual policy change that helps young families.
- I support causes that are concrete and not just symbolic.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)
Age: 23 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm wary of how such proclamations are used politically, especially affecting reproductive rights.
- I prefer policies that actively ensure equal protection and support diversity.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The notion of supporting parents is good, but real support requires action.
- A proclamation is a start, but I'd like to see follow-through in terms of resources for working parents.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Pastor (Houston, TX)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy aligns with our community's values, and I hope it inspires more gratitude for life.
- I will promote its significance more during sermons.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
College Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 19 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't see this affecting me or my peers directly.
- There are bigger issues that need addressing, like climate change. This feels like a distraction.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Healthcare Worker (Seattle, WA)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The sentiment is nice, but I'm more concerned with practical support for healthcare and childcare.
- We need policies and funds that address these material concerns.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retired Engineer (Boston, MA)
Age: 68 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this as more ceremonial than effective.
- Would be nice if such proclamations came with actionable steps to support elderly in caring roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Year 2: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Year 3: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Year 5: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Year 10: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Year 100: $500000 (Low: $100000, High: $1000000)
Key Considerations
- The annual cost is primarily linked to administrative and promotional activities stemming from the observance.
- There are no provisions for direct spending increases or decreases in tax revenues.
- Indirect effects such as shifts in public awareness or civic engagement are difficult to quantify.