Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4536

Bill Overview

Title: Great Salt Lake Recovery Act

Description: This bill authorizes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to study the hydrology of saline lake ecosystems in the Great Basin, including the Great Salt Lake, Utah, as well as to investigate the feasibility of a project for ecosystem restoration and drought solutions in the Great Salt Lake.

Sponsors: Sen. Romney, Mitt [R-UT]

Target Audience

Population: People residing in the proximate area of the Great Salt Lake and dependent on its ecosystem

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Environmental Scientist (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a crucial first step in understanding the lake's declining health.
  • I'm concerned about the budget being too limited.
  • Any vital restoration projects would still be years away even after study completion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Recreational Business Owner (Ogden, UT)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Restoration could revitalize my business, but I'm worried about the time it will take.
  • The study is promising but feels too abstract right now.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 2

Student (Provo, UT)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Happy to see focus on local ecosystems.
  • Wish there was more immediate action rather than just a study.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important for preserving the wildlife I've observed for years.
  • I'm skeptical about how much they can do with the budget provided.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 4

Elementary School Teacher (West Valley City, UT)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Educating students about these efforts is vital.
  • Long-term benefits could mean more educational material and field trip options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Truck Driver (Tooele, UT)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Doesn't directly concern me unless it affects my routes.
  • It's good they are looking into the lake's health, I guess.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Mineral Extraction Specialist (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The stability of my job depends on the lake's status, so this could be positive.
  • I wish there was more concrete action attached to the policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Waiter (Orem, UT)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that helps the lake is good for recreation lovers.
  • I've seen the lake's conditions worsen, hoping this study leads to something substantial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 7 3

Real Estate Agent (Kaysville, UT)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Restoring the lake could mean a property value boost.
  • The policy feels like the start but lacks immediate benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Local Government Official (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a necessary first step to solve a complex issue.
  • I hope for further actionable projects post-study but budget concerns remain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations