Bill Overview
Title: Prairie du Rocher French Colonial National Historical Park Establishment Act
Description: This bill establishes the Prairie du Rocher French Colonial National Historical Park in Illinois. The Department of the Interior may construct or lease space to operate and maintain an interpretive center for the park.
Sponsors: Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]
Target Audience
Population: People interested in or impacted by the establishment of Prairie du Rocher Historical Park
Estimated Size: 60000
- The bill establishes a national historical park in Prairie du Rocher, Illinois, which will directly affect the local population, including residents, local businesses, and community stakeholders.
- The historical park will likely draw tourists, which will have economic implications for the region, potentially impacting people dependent on the tourism industry.
- National historical parks are of educational and cultural significance, likely impacting students, historians, researchers, and educators, both within the region and beyond.
- The park will be managed by the Department of the Interior, so federal employees and park service employees could see job impacts or opportunities.
Reasoning
- The population directly impacted will be primarily the residents of Prairie du Rocher, Illinois, and surrounding communities. This area's residents might see changes in their economic situation, job opportunities, and community development.
- Local businesses such as restaurants, hotels, and shops might benefit from an influx of tourists attracted by the park, boosting the local economy.
- Historians, educators, and students across the country might not experience direct economic changes but will have additional resources and opportunities for engagement due to the park.
- Federal and park employees will see job impacts, with some likely experiencing increased job opportunities and job changes due to the establishment of the park.
- Across the broader population, there will be people with interest in French Colonial history who will see cultural and educational benefits, although these might not translate into substantial wellbeing changes.
Simulated Interviews
Small business owner (Prairie du Rocher, IL)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the new park could bring in more customers to my café, which is exciting.
- I'm a bit worried about the potential increase in rent or property taxes, though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
History teacher (St. Louis, MO)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park's establishment is a fantastic resource for my teaching curriculum.
- I hope to organize field trips to the park, which will greatly benefit my students.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
State tourism official (Springfield, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The new park will be a centerpiece in our tourism campaigns.
- I'm hopeful it will boost tourism in Illinois significantly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Retired (Prairie du Rocher, IL)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park might bring more people to our town, but I hope it doesn't change things too much.
- It could provide new opportunities for the local young people.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Archeologist (Belleville, IL)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm thrilled by the potential for new discoveries and collaborations.
- The park will be an invaluable resource for research and public engagement.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
Graduate student (Carbondale, IL)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park will be a valuable addition to my research resources.
- I look forward to having a new, nearby place for fieldwork and study.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Tourist agency owner (Saint Louis, MO)
Age: 41 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A national historical park in Prairie du Rocher would enhance the tours I offer.
- I'm considering adding it to my tours, which could attract more clients.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Federal park employee (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 67 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park might mean more job opportunities and responsibilities for park employees.
- I'm hopeful about overseeing new projects related to the park.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Local government officer (Chester, IL)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park establishment could prompt infrastructural improvements.
- I anticipate new initiatives to boost regional economic growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Primary school teacher (Farmington, MO)
Age: 53 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having a local historical park adds great value to teaching children about history.
- I look forward to planning field trips here.
- I doubt there will be any direct economic impact on me, though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)
Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)
Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)
Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)
Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)
Key Considerations
- Initial infrastructure costs for establishment might be significant, followed by reduced operational costs.
- Environmental assessments may be required, impacting both costs and timelines.
- Local economic boost through tourism and employment opportunities should be weighed against upfront costs.