Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4489

Bill Overview

Title: Grandfamilies Act of 2022

Description: 22 This bill expands access to specified programs for children living with grandparents or other family members who are not their legal guardian. Specifically, the bill provides that a child of a relative eligible for Old-Age and Survivors Insurance benefits is eligible for such benefit payments if that child (1) began living with such relative before age 18, (2) receives at least 50% of their support from such relative, and (3) has lived with such relative pursuant to a court order for at least 12 months. Additionally, the bill revises the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) eligibility requirements for children living with specified caretaker relatives. First, the bill lessens the requirement for TANF applicants to assign their rights to child support when such assignment may impact the likelihood of reunifying the child with their noncustodial parent, such as where the noncustodial parent is working to gain financial stability so they may reunify with their child. Further, when a child, but not the caretaker relative, receives TANF benefits (i.e., child-only cases), or if the caretaker relative is 55 or older, the bill (1) excludes such caretaker’s income from that child’s eligibility determination, (2) removes the 5-year cap on assistance, and (3) exempts such caretaker relatives from TANF work requirements. The bill also (1) encourages states to enact temporary guardianship laws, (2) provides grants for state plans to support caretaker relatives, and (3) requires the Administration for Community Living to provide grants for establishing cross-sector partnerships that support families with caretaker relatives.

Sponsors: Sen. Casey, Robert P., Jr. [D-PA]

Target Audience

Population: Children living with grandparents or other family members without legal guardianship

Estimated Size: 2700000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired school teacher (Tucson, AZ)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome any help that can ease our financial strain. Raising two grandchildren on a fixed income is difficult.
  • The exemption from work requirements for TANF is a relief, I worry about this all the time even though I'm retired.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Paralegal (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's comforting to know there may be additional help. It's been tough since their mother passed and any financial relief helps.
  • I'm especially interested in changes to TANF as I barely qualify now.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Retail worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I struggle to provide for my siblings as I don't have legal guardianship, so accessing benefits is tough.
  • Hoping this bill makes it easier to get some help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 4 2
Year 20 3 2

Health care aide (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having extra support for being over 55 would make things a lot easier.
  • The longest I've been able to count on assistance is for a year at a time, so the changes to TANF are welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Unemployed (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any financial aid would help me provide more for my cousin while I try to find stable work.
  • It's difficult to access assistance programs because of red tape.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 4 3
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 3 2
Year 10 3 2
Year 20 3 2

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 78 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Living off savings while raising a child is tough. I can't work anymore at my age, so this bill could really help.
  • Social security only goes so far, and emergencies can be financially crippling.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 2

Nurse (Denver, CO)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If guardianship laws were easier, life would be so much less stressful.
  • Being a foster parent and having to deal with all these financial hurdles is exhausting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired social worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 66 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen the difference support systems can make, having worked in social services myself.
  • Raising my grandchild is rewarding but very demanding, and this policy could make the financial burden lighter.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 2

Freelance graphic designer (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Juggling freelance work and caregiving means I often miss out on potential income—any additional aid is beneficial.
  • Hoping this policy allows me more stability and support for my nephews.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Part-time retail (New York, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's tough working part-time to fit caregiving needs, so any financial help would be appreciated.
  • The TANF changes are the most intriguing because that's less examined in New York where costs are so high.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $525000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $630000000)

Year 3: $551250000 (Low: $441000000, High: $661500000)

Year 5: $611051250 (Low: $488841000, High: $733261500)

Year 10: $776161645 (Low: $621413845, High: $931637795)

Year 100: $3761555398 (Low: $3010592862, High: $4512517934)

Key Considerations