Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4469

Bill Overview

Title: SAD Act

Description: This bill prohibits advertisements that use deceptive or misleading statements related to the provision of abortion services. Abortion services include (1) surgical and non-surgical procedures to terminate a pregnancy, or (2) providing referrals for such procedures. The Federal Trade Commission must promulgate rules to implement the prohibition, and the bill provides for enforcement by the commission.

Sponsors: Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ]

Target Audience

Population: Women of childbearing age seeking abortion services

Estimated Size: 65000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (New York, NY)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm nervous about making sure I get the right information on where to go.
  • I encountered many misleading websites that caused more stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Marketing Manager (Austin, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is critical; misleading information has real-world implications on health.
  • I'm relieved this will help others not go through what I did with misinformation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Accurate information is a fundamental right when making such decisions.
  • I'm hopeful this act will reduce stress for women with unwanted pregnancies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 3

Retail Assistant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It might not impact me directly now, but I support better information outreach.
  • This ensures my friends have safer, clearer options. That's comforting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

HR Manager (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I'm past childbearing age, I worry about my daughters facing misinformation.
  • I support this policy wholeheartedly for a better societal impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

IT Specialist (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I always seek to ensure others get reliable information.
  • This policy is a great step towards secure decision-making environments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

College Student (Orlando, FL)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's unsettling knowing false information is out there when making serious choices.
  • The act sounds comforting for future decisions I may make.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 3

Journalist (Boston, MA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing the accuracy of advertised information is being checked feels like a win.
  • This policy can help my work expose and correct misinformation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Graphic Designer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's essential to regulate misleading ads that prey on vulnerable situations.
  • Having informed consent is crucial, so this act could boost information integrity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Secondary School Teacher (Denver, CO)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This isn't just about me; it's about what my students face every day.
  • Accurate information is empowerment, so this policy can assist educators too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 5: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 10: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 100: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Key Considerations