Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4463

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to terminate General License No. 8C of the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury and require the application of sanctions under Executive Order 14024 to the entities listed in General License No. 8C.

Description: This bill terminates General License No. 8C, which was issued by the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control to authorize energy-related transactions involving specified Russian financial institutions. Further, the bill applies property-blocking sanctions to those Russian financial institutions listed in the license.

Sponsors: Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals impacted by the termination of OFAC's General License No. 8C and related sanctions

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Energy Market Analyst (New York City, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I closely monitor changes in energy trade policies.
  • This policy could disrupt some of our European clients sourcing energy under this license.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 9

Oil Company Worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the sanctions affecting our operations in Europe.
  • This might lead to job uncertainty if we can't navigate new regulations effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Manufacturing Plant Manager (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If energy prices spike, we might struggle with operational costs.
  • This could indirectly affect us through increased utility bills.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Tech Startup Founder (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sanctions like these can open opportunities for new tech solutions in energy.
  • I'm optimistic about positioning our tech to aid companies affected by sanctions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 10 10
Year 5 10 10
Year 10 10 10
Year 20 10 10

Retired (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry any energy price increase will hurt my budget.
  • This policy seems aimed at companies, but it could affect consumers indirectly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 6 7

Import/Export Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Changes in energy markets can affect my shipping routes and costs.
  • If our partners face sanctions, it disrupts our predictive logistics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 9
Year 20 8 9

Environmental Policy Advocate (Chicago, IL)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies that restrict fossil fuel trades might accelerate clean energy adoption.
  • I hope this pushes companies to invest in sustainable energy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 9

Attorney specializing in international trade (Dallas, TX)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will increase demand for compliance services.
  • We expect more clients needing advice on adapting to these changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Freelance Journalist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy provides a lot to cover in terms of geopolitical energy strategies.
  • Sanctions often bring uncertainty, which can drive reader interest.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 9

Investment Advisor (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Russian-related investments need careful re-evaluation now.
  • There may be volatility, but also opportunities in renewables.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $40000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $45000000)

Year 2: $38000000 (Low: $33000000, High: $43000000)

Year 3: $37000000 (Low: $32000000, High: $42000000)

Year 5: $36000000 (Low: $31000000, High: $41000000)

Year 10: $34000000 (Low: $29000000, High: $39000000)

Year 100: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)

Key Considerations