Bill Overview
Title: American Technology Leadership Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes an Office of Global Competition Analysis. The purposes of the office are to carry out a program of analysis on U.S. leadership in technology and innovation sectors critical to national security and economic prosperity relative to other countries, particularly those countries that are strategic competitors of the United States; and support policy development and decision-making to ensure U.S. leadership in technology and innovation sectors critical to national security and economic prosperity. To carry out the purposes, the office shall enter into an agreement with a public-private or a federally funded research and development center, a university affiliated research center, or consortium of such centers. Periodically, the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), the National Economic Council, and the National Security Council, in coordination with other executive agencies, shall jointly determine the analytical priorities of the office.
Sponsors: Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Target Audience
Population: People in the technology and innovation sectors
Estimated Size: 30000000
- The bill focuses on U.S. leadership in technology and innovation sectors, impacting sectors involved in national security and economic prosperity.
- The global technology and innovation community may feel indirect impacts as the U.S. strengthens its competition strategies against key international competitors.
- Technology industries worldwide that have interactions with U.S. sectors may experience shifts in partnerships, competition levels, and collaboration efforts.
Reasoning
- The policy targets the technology and innovation sectors critical to U.S. national security and economic prosperity.
- People working in these sectors, like technology professionals, researchers, and developers, are likely to be directly affected by the policy.
- Indirect impacts may be felt by people in supporting industries or those who are in academia related to technology fields.
- Since the budget is limited, impacts are expected to be moderate initially but may grow as the budget increases over time.
- The different levels of impact will depend on the role of individuals in their sectors, with some experiencing direct job creation or innovation opportunities.
Simulated Interviews
AI Researcher (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe the policy could enhance our competitive edge globally.
- It might bring more funding and focused priorities to our research areas.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Defense Technology Analyst (Arlington, VA)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is crucial for maintaining our national security advantage.
- I'm hopeful it will lead to more insightful analyses and reports.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Tech Entrepreneur (Austin, TX)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy may offer new opportunities for startups like mine.
- I'm optimistic about potential collaborations and contracts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
University Professor (Boston, MA)
Age: 51 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could lead to enhanced funding for academic research.
- I anticipate increased collaboration between universities and government bodies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Senior Software Developer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy will have a limited impact on my day-to-day work.
- Long-term, it could influence our project priorities at the company.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Patent Attorney (Raleigh, NC)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The initiative might ramp up patent filings in emerging tech areas.
- Currently, I'm uncertain how the policy translates to legal practices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Financial Analyst (New York, NY)
Age: 48 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm curious about how the policy will affect international tech investment.
- There might be more emphasis on domestic tech firm growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Graduate Student (Denver, CO)
Age: 26 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope for increased educational grants and projects tied to this policy.
- It's exciting to think about contributing to national tech initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Technology Policy Advisor (Silicon Valley, CA)
Age: 54 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The bill's focus matches current industry needs and trends.
- It opens lines for proactive policy advisory and development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Biomedical Engineer (Chicago, IL)
Age: 44 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I expect minimal impact from this policy on my current work.
- Indirect effects could involve shifts in funding priorities or collaborations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 2: $54000000 (Low: $43000000, High: $66000000)
Year 3: $58000000 (Low: $46000000, High: $70000000)
Year 5: $64000000 (Low: $52000000, High: $77000000)
Year 10: $75000000 (Low: $61000000, High: $90000000)
Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $120000000)
Key Considerations
- The integration of the new office and its priorities must harmonize with existing governmental technology initiatives to prevent redundancy.
- Assessing the competitive landscape through the new office might necessitate sensitive disclosures that must be managed to protect national interests.
- The office's findings may have geopolitical consequences, influencing international relations in technology sectors.